Roop Singh Pandey And Ors.(3) (In Jail) vs The State Of U.P. on 29 February, 2016
police station to lodge the FIR it was only human error on the part of the prosecutor that before putting the question as to when
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 157 (0.79 seconds)Mukesh Kumar vs State (Home Department)Ors on 7 November, 2016
justify and stated that it is not deliberate but
because of human error being committed at the same time made a
statement after perusal
Ugma & Anr vs State on 24 November, 2016
background of the report that
the injuries were fresh in origin. Mere error in
mentioning the time will not invalidate the credible
eye-witnesses account ... numerous
other post mortems. Some leeway has to be given for
human errors. If there is any conflict between the
medical evidence
Lalu Ram vs State on 22 September, 2016
alleged to be sustained with human
blood. According to the learned counsel for the
appellant a grave error has been committed by the
learned trial ... because
in the FSL report it is reported that no human blood
was found upon the axe, therefore, the finding of the
learned trial court
The State Of Maharashtra vs Ramchandra Sambhaji Karanjule on 11 March, 2016
The State Of Maharashtra vs Ramchandra Sambhaji Karanjule on 11 March, 2016
Author: Anuja Prabhudessai
Anand Singh vs State on 25 October, 2016
error or a slip it is the duty of the judge to
ascertain whether it was so, for, to err is
human and the chances ... useful exercise
for trial judge to remain active and alert so
that errors can be minimised."
Crl. App.No. 839/2016 Page
Jagdish vs State on 17 August, 2016
presence of witness Hajari Lal upon which
ultimately human blood was found as per FSL report.
It is also argued that in presence of witness ... said weapon also, the
human blood was found, therefore, it cannot be said
that learned trial court has committed any error to hold
accused appellant
Pooja Pal vs Union Of India And Ors on 22 January, 2016
Pooja Pal vs Union Of India And Ors on 22 January, 2016
Equivalent citations: AIR
Prem Singh vs State (Govt Of Nct Of Delhi) on 8 December, 2016
same time. Further, we cannot rule out the
possibility of error committed while conducting the DNA test and the
condition in which the samples were ... Page
543, wherein it has been noted as under:
"(a) Technical Errors
Firstly, the DNA-probe can be contaminated or
degraded. This is specially
Pooja Pal vs Union Of India on 22 January, 2016
Pooja Pal vs Union Of India on 22 January, 2016
Author: Amitava Roy
Bench: Amitava