nature to
discredit the prosecution case and rather the result of
human error, hence should have not been given undue
weightage.
26. In the opinion
arrest of the appellant from the place of
occurrence such human error does not render the prosecution case
improbable.
However, a more fundamental breach
where the appellant was apprehended. The cutting,
therefore, is because of human error and does not make the whole site
plan false and incorrect
their depositions can be attributed to failure of human
memory and that the said errors are inconsequential. Similarly, in Vijay
Kumar Chadha
writing some
letters/characters, overwriting occurs due to natural human
conduct or clerical error. Accordingly, this argument is also
without any force
present
case are minor and are infact simple errors of observation which occurs in
human nature. The testimony of the witnesses are otherwise corroborating
each
present case are minor and are infact simple errors of
observation which occurs in human nature. The testimony of the witnesses are otherwise
corroborating each
present case are minor and are infact simple errors of observation
which occurs in human nature. The testimony of the witnesses are otherwise
corroborating each
consistent with all human probability
that the act must have been done only by the respondents.
15. We find no error being committed
error or
a slip it is the duty of the Judge to ascertain whether it
was so, for, to err is human and the chances ... useful exercise for
trial Judge to remain active and alert so that errors can
be minimized."
20. The Appellate Court also had a duty