Mr. Trivikraman Thampy vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2025
Author: S.R.Krishna
Play Games 24X7 Private Limited vs State Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2025
Author: S
conceive the grievance of the petitioner and
find resolution of trivial human error, this Court may
W.P.(C) No.18621 of 2025 Page ... meaning of
"assessment". The figures and facts due to human error
reflected in such returns and discovered subsequently
W.P.(C) No.18621
borne in
mind when considering the cases of
inadvertent human errors creeping into the
filing of GST returns.
14. Applying such principles to the
facts ... observed that an error committed by the
petitioner is an inadvertent human error and
the petitioner should not be prevented from
rectifying the same
tried to
explain the interpolation in the arrest memo as a human error.
Human error may be contained in one or two places ... arrest memos and other relevant places, similar human error
had occurred, which explanation appears to this Court to be hard
Patna High Court
tried to
explain the interpolation in the arrest memo as a human error.
Human error may be contained in one or two places ... arrest memos and other relevant places, similar human error
had occurred, which explanation appears to this Court to be hard
Patna High Court
borne in mind when considering the cases of
inadvertent human errors creeping into the filing
of GST returns.
14. Applying such principles to the facts ... observed that
an error committed by the petitioner is an
inadvertent human error and the petitioner
discrepancy of 24
votes must have happened due to possible human error on
the part of Presiding Officer of Polling Booth No. 37 in
preparing ... means
appears to be an outcome of an inadvertent human error,
and, the possibility of error on the part of Presiding
Officer of Polling Booth
discrepancy of 24
votes must have happened due to possible human error on
the part of Presiding Officer of Polling Booth No. 37 in
preparing ... means
appears to be an outcome of an inadvertent human error,
and, the possibility of error on the part of Presiding
Officer of Polling Booth
discrepancy of 24
votes must have happened due to possible human error on
the part of Presiding Officer of Polling Booth No. 37 in
preparing ... means
appears to be an outcome of an inadvertent human error,
and, the possibility of error on the part of Presiding
Officer of Polling Booth