Additional Director General of Police,
(Social Justice and Human Rights)
Chennai.
7.The Inspector General of Police,
South Zone,
Madurai.
8.The Superintendent of Police ... respondents.
7.Placing reliance on the provisions of Protection of Human
Rights Act, 1993 , principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
George Fort,
Chennai-9.
2)The Additional Director General
of Police, Human Rights and Social
Justice CID, Anna Nagar West,
Chennai.
3)The Superintendent ... Apex Court held that right to life includes right to human dignity. The right against torture cruelty or unusual punishment or degraded treatment has been
SECRETARY, OMALLUR,
PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 647.
3 THE KERALA STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, TURBO PLUS TOWER,
PMG JUNCTION, VIKAS BHAVAN ... Being aggrieved by the order dated 20.06.2016 passed by the State
Human Rights Commission, Thiruvananthapuram in HRMP No.253/2016
(Ext.P7), directing
House of Lords however,
stressed that in all cases raising a human rights issue proportionality
is the appropriate standard of review.
25. The House ... heightened scrutiny test is not necessarily
appropriate to the protection of human rights.
Lord Steyn also felt most cases
DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF
ALAPPUZHA PO, ALAPPUZHA.688001.
2 THE KERALA STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION
REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, P.M.G
JUNCTION,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.695033 ... respondent herein, made a complaint to the
Kerala State Human Rights Commission, alleging that the writ
petitioner, along with other Police officials, forcefully entered
Kunhali vs The Tahsildar on 6 January, 2021
Author: S. Manikumar
Bench: S.Manikumar , Shaji
stand adopted by the respondents, petitioner has
approached the Kerala State Human Rights Commission, for redressal of
his grievance. The Commission has initiated proceedings vide ... contended that the petitioner cannot rely
on the direction of the Human Rights Commission and order of the
Commission for Child Rights when the criteria
House of Lords however, stressed that in all cases
raising a human rights issue proportionality is the appropriate
standard of review.
25. The House ... heightened scrutiny test is not necessarily
appropriate to the protection of human rights.
Lord Steyn also felt most cases would be decided in the
same
Kerala Pouravakasa Samrakshana ... vs Kerala State Human Rights Commission on 29 January, 2020
Author: S.Manikumar
Bench: S.Manikumar , Shaji P.Chaly
IN THE HIGH ... DEAGO JOHN K
SHRI.AMAL DEV C.V.
RESPONDENT:
KERALA STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, TURBO PLUS TOWER,
PMG JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
DEPARTMENT OF HOME, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
2 KERALA STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION,
REPRESENTED BY MEMBER SECRETARY, VIKAS BHAVAN, P.O.
TRIVANDRUM ... order dated 27th March 2020 passed by the Kerala
State Human Rights Commission in Case
No.1870/11/12/2021.
2. Short facts leading
