corroborated by his previous identification in
the test identification parade or any other
evidence. The previous identification in the test
identification parade is a check ... identified some of the
accused in the dock as mentioned above without
corroborative evidence the dock identification
alone cannot be treated as substantial evidence,
though
Judge has convicted the
appellants only on the basis of their dock identification by PW2 Bimla
and PW4 Alka, ignoring that the witnesses were examined ... basis for drawing adverse presumption
against the appellants and accepting the dock identification by the
Crl.A.Nos.31/2000,40/2000,87/2000
appellant. Further, the complainant has
identified the appellant in dock and merely because the dock
identification was not preceded by the TIP, would not mean ... corroborated by his previous identification in
the test identification parade or any other
evidence. The previous identification in the test
identification parade is a check
conduct Test
Identification Parade (TIP), and in absence of TIP, the
dock identification of the accused persons by the
witnesses would become highly doubtful, more ... submitted that it would become fatal in a
riot case, and dock identification, first time in the
Court, would not be evidence safe to rely
taken away his brother. He did not identify the appellant in the
dock.
21. Girja Devi (P.W.8) states in her evidence that about ... brother Chandra Bhushan
Sharma. On seeing the appellant in the dock, she states that he was
involved in the occurrence.
22. In cross-examination
taken away his brother. He did not identify the appellant in the
dock.
21. Girja Devi (P.W.8) states in her evidence that about ... brother Chandra Bhushan
Sharma. On seeing the appellant in the dock, she states that he was
involved in the occurrence.
22. In cross-examination
corroborated by his previous identification in
the test identification parade or any other
evidence. The previous identification in the test
identification parade is a check ... identified some of the
accused in the dock as mentioned above without
corroborative evidence the dock identification
alone cannot be treated as substantial evidence,
though
corroborated by his previous identification in
the test identification parade or any other
evidence. The previous identification in the test
identification parade is a check ... identified some of the
accused in the dock as mentioned above without
corroborative evidence the dock identification
alone cannot be treated as substantial evidence,
though
testimony of PW-2 and PW-3 as well as dock identification. However, co-accused Sattideen was acquitted upon finding that the test identification parade ... test identification parade is an investigative step. Failure to hold test identification parade does not make the evidence of identification in court inadmissible. Where
identified them in the court when they were in the dock. This
dock identification of the three accused by child witness in the court ... three assailants before the police. The High Court relied on
dock identification stating that the child witness used to regularly visit
his deceased grandfather Mata
