Section 39 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
both inclusive (that is to say, offences relating to illegal gratification); (iv) Sections 272 to 278 both inclusive (that is to say, offences relating
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10277 (1.47 seconds)Banarsi Dass vs State Of Haryana on 5 April, 2010
further the case of the prosecution that
the appellant demanded illegal gratification of Rs. 900/-
(rupees nine hundred) but that deal was struck ... prosecution in relation to the demand and receipt of the
illegal gratification, had examined mainly four witnesses; Sat
Pal Kaur (PW-2), Gurmej Singh
T. Subramanian vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 4 January, 2006
acceptance of the sum of Rs.200/- by the
appellant as illegal gratification. Consequently, by judgment
dated 13.7.1991 the appellant was acquitted.
6. The State ... established that the said
amount was received as illegal gratification in connection with
grant of patta in favour of PW-1 in respect
Neeraj Dutta vs State(Govt.Of N.C.T.Of Delhi) on 15 December, 2022
offence defined in this section.
(b) “Gratification”. The word “gratification” is not
restricted to pecuniary gratifications or to
gratifications estimable in money.
(c) “Legal remuneration ... appellant accepted or obtained a gratification other than legal
remuneration; and
(iii) the gratification was for illegal purpose.
While discussing the expression “accept
Krishan Chander vs State Of Delhi on 6 January, 2016
improbable.
It was further contended by him that the demand of illegal gratification by
the accused is a sine qua non for constitution ... support the prosecution
case that the demand of Rs.1000/- as illegal gratification was made by the
appellant from him for release of Krishna Kumar
C.M.Sharma vs State Of A.P. Th. I.P on 25 November, 2010
passed the final bill and
demanded Rs. 3,000/- as illegal gratification and reminded the
contractor that he did not pay any amount in respect ... earlier
bills. The contractor expressed his inability to pay the illegal
gratification but the appellant insisted and asked him to bring
the money on 20th
P.Satyanarayana Murthy vs Dist.Insp.Of Police & Anr on 14 September, 2015
Technical
Education, Hyderabad had on 3.10.1996 demanded by way of illegal
gratification Rs. 1000/- for effecting renewal of the recognition of his
(complainant) typing institute ... prosecution had failed to prove any demand for the alleged
illegal gratification involved and, thus, the vitally essential ingredient
of the offences both under Sections
V.Sejappa vs State By Police Insp.Lokayukta on 12 April, 2016
accused demanded a sum of Rs.5,000/- as illegal gratification from
him for handing over ‘No Objection Certificate’ (NOC) to process his
pension papers ... prosecution has failed to prove the demand and acceptance of
illegal gratification of Rs.5,000/- by the accused from PW-1 for issuing
A. N. D'Silva vs Union Of India on 6 December, 1961
that
irregularities were committed by him with a view
to secure illegal gratification for himself and
others and secondly, that he was a party ... commission of irregularities having thereby
facilitated acceptance of illegal gratification by
his subordinates. The enquiry officer found him
guilty of misdemeanour by disobeying orders
expressly
Commr.Of Police,Delhi & Ors vs Jai Bhagwan on 10 May, 2011
posted there the respondent extorted Rs. 100/- by way of
illegal gratification from her during the course of security
check of passengers. It is alleged ... Shift A.
NITC had extorted Rs. 100/- as an illegal gratification from
Mrs. Ranjana Kapoor during the course of Security Check of
passengers of flight