case of
Kalappa Manappa Kammanr vs. Assistant
Commissioner reported in ILR 1989 KAR 988, it is held
that, any person aggrieved ... Special Deputy
Commissioner, Bangalore District and others reported
in ILR 2002 KAR 2750 - para 8, to the effect that, every
revenue officer
Special Deputy Commissioner,
Bangalore District and Others , reported in ILR 2002
KAR 2750, as under;
"59. He further contended that the
second ... Special
Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore
District and others reported in ILR
2002 KAR 2750 and held that the
revenue courts are precluded from going
Shivakumar.
3) ILR 1989 KAR 993 in Dada Jinappa Khot Vs.
Shivalingappa Ganapathi Bellanki .
4) AIR 2006 SC 3608 in Prem Singh ... ILR 2007 KAR 1484 in W.E.Sambandam Vs.
W.E.Sathyanarayanam and others .
6) ILR 2002 KAR 2750
other otherwise of a document or challenge to
1
ILR 2002 KAR 2750
53
the documents on the ground of fraud, undue
influence
otherwise of a document or challenge to the
2
ILR 2002 KAR 2750
dispute, vide C N NARENDRASINGH
Vs. SPL. DEPUTY COMMISISONER , ILR 2002 KAR 2750
FB & SMT. JAYAMMA Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA, ILR
whatsoever.
-8-
NC: 2025:KHC:48259
WP No. 13354 of 2023
HC-KAR
7. Be that as it may, in the face of the contention ... Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru
District and Others [ILR 2002 KAR 2750], where it was
held as follows:
"9. Considering Rule 43, when
Nagendra Singh vs.
Special Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru , reported
in ILR 2002 KAR 2750, while answering the reference,
has held that the revenue courts ... law.
Unless the petitioner is able to prove the genuineness of
the will, adhering to strict compliance under Section 63 of
the Indian Succession
properties. A person
who acquires right under registered document may not
even report it to the revenue officers, but there is a
mandatory duty cost ... property. The petitioner's contention that there
1
ILR 2002 KAR 2750
Special
Deputy Commissioner, Bengalore District and Others ,
reported in ILR 2002 KAR 2750.
"7. Section 127 of the Act deals with
preparation
