Ajai Kumar Jain's report, the insured provided him the IMEI numbers of 16 mobile sets only while the IMEI of the remaining ... incidence of burglary to be genuine. But he did not check the IMEI numbers and other details of the stolen mobiles. The Third surveyor
insurance
company that the complainant had not submitted bill books/invoices/ Mobile IMEI
numbers purchase proof establishing the availability of goods.
16. The opposite party ... mobile handsets no proof of
identity of those lost and their IMEI NOs which are unique to each handset,
were submitted. The sale biis
cell details are mentioned as Model No. NOKIA 5130, Colour-Red, IMEI No.35
308 and service details mentioned as full dead and charge ... printed form and the details of cell entrusted
mentioned as model 5130, IMEI as 828768/C which is said to have been taken
for repair
purchased a mobile handset Nokia model No.N-72-5
Black, IMEI 359400001282333 from present respondent ... said mobile hand set Nokia
model No.N-72-5 Black, IMEI 359400001282333 and get the defects
rectified within a period of two months from
complainant has filed the list in which he has given the IMEI Nos. of
39 mobile handsets only as against 94 mobile handsets alleged ... complainant can not sell
such mobile handsets which do not bear IMEI Nos. is not tenable
because if such numbers are not quoted
complainant
had purchased one Apple Phone 6 (16 GB) mobile bearing IMEI
No.355395077028780 from opposite party No.2 for Rs.28,000/-.
He insured ... complainant has admitted that he had
damaged his iphone 6 bearing IMEI No.355395077028780 in
April, 2017 by accidently dropping it and some liquid poured
description as to how damage has happened and
clear image which shows IMEI number and the complainant
had complied with the same ... damage happened
clearly and further he also
which shows the "IMEI" number
to give any reason
received a call from them (opposite party
mobile handset was
arranged and delivered to the complainant, on 23.03.2012, bearing IMEI
No.354773040004578. It was further stated that the Engineer of Opposite Party ... lieu of the old mobile handset,
replaced new mobile handset bearing IMEI No.354773040004578, as is proved from
the evidence, on record, was handed over
mobile handset was replaced by new one on 2.2.2013 with
IMEI No.91001001342399. It was further stated that the Opposite Party once
again replaced ... mobile with a new mobile handset on 23.3.2013 with IMEI
No.911214352813229. It was further stated that the complainant concealed the
true facts
Surveyor and also the fact that
appellant has failed to supply the IMEI numbers of
the handsets, allegedly purchased by him, from
Page ... give the details of mobile sets in the
form of their IMEI numbers, which he purchased
from his father and other suppliers, which the
appellant
