were also obtained. It was found that one mobile
instrument bearing IMEI No. 358061003458460 was used to operate all three
mobile numbers ... numbers were being
used by one person having custody of mobile bearing IMEI No.
358061003458460 and both telephone nos. 9810798109 and 9818998187
admittedly belonged
same was marked Exhibit P3. On the cardboard box, the IMEI number
of the mobile phone Nokia 2600 was mentioned as 356396026901613.
The purchase ... marked Exhibit P2. He stated that on
the cardboard box, the IMEI number of the phone was written as
356396026901613. The said mobile phone
Investigating Officer checked the
same and discovered that it was having the IMEI No.
352703042639537 with a battery. According to the witness he
thereafter converted ... case property i.e. mobile of
black colour make Nokia 2700 bearing IMEI No.
352703042639537 which his Ex.P1; the cycle make Atlas with
mobile phone
of black and brown colour of make LG 6210 having IMEI No.
A0000021B21B22 as the same as belong to her husband which ... identified mobile phone of black and brown
color make LG6210 bearing IMEI No. A0000021B21B22 as the same as
belonging to his deceased brother which
offence. During the investigation the mobile phone of make Nokia
IMEI 352938102138498811 was recovered from Manoj which had sim card ... ladies wrist watch & a mobile phone make Nokia
IMEI no 354162022051338 with card of no 9733639007 were recovered from Pintoo.
Accused Pintoo also
Delhi accused Anil was found in
possession of one mobile phone having IMEI No. 359947000242460
which he received or retained in his possession knowing ... accused Vishal @ Monu was found in possession of
one mobile phone having IMEI No. 356845013423262 which he
received or retained in his possession knowing
further details, this
mobile was activated on 06092008 having IMEI No.353632017354930,
later on mobile No.9718490182 was used on phone having IMEI ... 355736021100990. Both IMEI numbers were scanned. It was observed
that phone No.9996793484 was working on IMEI No.353632017354930.
Thereafter, the CDR and the address
further revealed that the
stolen mobile phone, which was having IMEI No.356941031855260, had been used to
operate mobile phone No. 9654433480 in the afternoon ... stated that same number was used on mobile phone with IMEI
No.356397029079430 till 23.02.2010 at 14:02:16 hours and that thereafter at about
according to which, mobile phone of deceased bearing No. 9910454946, having
IMEI no. 355021001099650 was working till 3.13 p.m. on 20/10/2006 ... accused Vijay @ Monti by inserting the
same in his mobile phone, having IMEI No. 352524004230290, so, this corroborates the
time of murder approximately
further deposed that it came to his
notice that he had given IMEI no. of mobile phones inadvertently wrong
in his complaint ... cross examination, PW1 deposed that on 03.10.2012 he
came to know that IMEI no. of both mobile number was wrongly
mentioned in FIR. He also
