deceased. Shri Vyas has also submitted that there are
material discrepancies in IMEI number allegedly belong to the appellant
Jeevan Jatav as there is discrepancy ... IMEI number of the seizure memo
and the IMEI number of the CDR proved as Ex.P/124, 135 and 167
whereas the seizure memo
applications to forthwith produce the following
mobile phones: -
(1) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.356723080949446 of Apple Company;
(2) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.356728111838724 ... Apple Company;
(3) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.868409043310506 of VIVO Company;
(4) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.352544473256346;
(5) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI
Manoj Sharma, a mobile phone of Nokia make-model 3315 bearing IMEI number 351479600989140 was recovered (Ext. Ka6). Another mobile of Siemens make was also ... dated 2.04.2004. He also stated that every mobile set has a unique IMEI number. The first fourteen digits of IMEI number always match. He further
applications to forthwith produce the following
mobile phones: -
(1) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.356723080949446 of Apple Company;
(2) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.356728111838724 ... Apple Company;
(3) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.868409043310506 of VIVO Company;
(4) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.352544473256346;
(5) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI
relating to the above two numbers of BSNL
to find out the IMEI numbers of the said phone numbers and
later he received information under ... Call
Data Records indicating IMEI numbers of the said mobile
phones basing on the calls received and made from those cell
phones and then
mobile No. 9971933571. Pursuant to an analysis of call detail
records, IMEI numbers and recorded conversations, the appellant was
apprehended from his House ... October, 2007 the number was used in a
handset with IMEI 354306002217230, in which handset mobile No.
9999966512 (issued in the name of the appellant
mobile phones were seized from the appellant
Chandra Shekhar @ Chhotu Chandra having IMEI mentioned in
the seizure memo (Ex.P-19), but the call details ... obtained do not
confirm that the mobile phone having IMEI number seized from the
Page 7 of 21
appellant Chandrashekar @ Chhotu Chandra was the same
mobile phones were seized from the appellant
Chandra Shekhar @ Chhotu Chandra having IMEI mentioned in
the seizure memo (Ex.P-19), but the call details ... obtained do not
confirm that the mobile phone having IMEI number seized from the
Page 7 of 21
appellant Chandrashekar @ Chhotu Chandra was the same
applications to forthwith produce the following
mobile phones: -
(1) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.356723080949446 of Apple Company;
(2) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.356728111838724 ... Apple Company;
(3) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.868409043310506 of VIVO Company;
(4) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI No.352544473256346;
(5) Mobile Phone bearing IMEI
whose
number is 7667546251, (II) one blue colour OPPO
mobile whose IMEI No. 861162044526172,
861162044526164,(III) Blue colour Redmi Mobile
whose IMEI No. 867473043248351,
Patna ... ASUS company
was recovered (X) one OPPO black colour mobile
whose IMEI no. 864693047227936,
864693047227928, (XI) one blue colour VIVO
mobile whose IMEI
