question from time immemorial. It is quite true that the expression "immemorial user" is not used in the plaint. The plaint shows that ... been enjoyed from time immemorial. It has been suggested in the course of the argument before us that immemorial user or ancient right cannot
question from time immemorial. It is quite True that the expression "immemorial user" is not used in the plaint. The plaint shows that ... been enjoyed from time immemorial. It has been suggested in the course of the argument before us that immemorial user or ancient right cannot
made by prescription despite the impossibility of proving "immemorial user." By English common law prescription had to run from time immemorial which ... originated since 1189, the proof of title by the prescription of immemorial user failed. To get round this difficulty Judges allowed or even encouraged juries
Courts. The defendant claims the right to light and air by immemorial user, but he has throughout claimed it as an owner until ... easement as of right for twenty years. Evidence of immemorial user adduced in support of a right founded on ownership, does not, when that right
then certainly that agreement must be adhered to. When there is immemorial user and sort of customary right is established, then also the courts will ... have to give due importance to such immemorial user while deciding the conflicting claims of the co-sharers to the common well. in my opinion
easement as of right for twenty years, Evidence of immemorial user adduced in support of a right founded on ownership, does not, when that right
Government, he decided, must be customary immemorial rights, and as he had found the fact of long user against the plaintiff, he decided that ... riparian right is a natural right and is not acquired by immemorial user. It exists by law, it may be lost by the adverse enjoyment
title to be made by prescription despite the impossibility of proving immemorial user. One indispensable condition that must be satisfied before invoking this doctrine ... established their right to put up Kachha Bandharas by reason of immemorial user under a grant which s lost.
(16) It was next urged
such, but the trust is in fact created by long and immemorial user for a period extending over a century and a quarter
yellow colour. The plaintiffs claim that by immemorial user and also by prescription they had a right of passage over the whole of the site ... they had acquired no such right either by prescription or by immemorial user. Actually two suite were field to establish these rights. Suit