Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Vikas Yadav vs State Of U.P And Ors. Etc. Etc on 3 October, 2016

provision is not intended to and cannot have the result of impliedly repealing provisions made in the substantive law i.e. the Hindu Marriage ... obstante provision in Section 20 is not intended to impliedly repeal provisions made in the Act of 1955. The Act of 1984 provides

Mr. L. Murali Krishna vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 9 March, 2016

Man Singh Jhagharia & Anr vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 9 March

statute would prevail over a general statute. (e) The Doctrine of implied repeal It is elaborated that Section 4(2) of the IPC provides that

Section 100 of the 2007 Rules, the 2001 Rules have been repealed. Moreover, Rule 96 of the 2007 Rules declares in no uncertain terms that ... doubt that 2003 Rules framed by the State Government are impliedly repealed by virtue of section 100 of 2007 Rules and until and unless

Vikas Yadav vs State Of U.P And Ors. Etc. Etc on 3 October, 2016

Azad Transport Company Pvt. Ltd & Ors vs The State Of Bihar Through Com on

Niraj Bhuwania vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 9 March, 2016 Author: Ashwani

Azad Transport Company Pvt. Ltd & Ors vs The State Of Bihar Through ... on 9