Jai Shankar Agrahari vs Union Of India And Another on 16 January, 2020
Jai Shankar Agrahari vs Union Of India And Another on 16 January, 2020
Equivalent citations
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (1.18 seconds)Lal Babu Singh And Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 14 February, 2020
evidence sufficient to warrant conviction. The enquiry u/s 202 CrPC is limited only to ascertain of truth or falsehood of allegations made ... passing of order of summoning any person as accused is a very important matter, which initiates criminal proceeding against him. Such orders cannot be passed
Jitendra @ Bablu Dixit And Others vs State Of U.P.And Another on 2 January, 2020
evidence sufficient to warrant conviction. The enquiry u/s 202 CrPC is limited only to ascertain of truth or falsehood of allegations made ... passing of order of summoning any person as accused is a very important matter, which initiates criminal proceeding against him. Such orders cannot be passed
Ramnath vs State Of U.P. And Another on 5 March, 2020
evidence sufficient to warrant conviction. The enquiry u/s 202 CrPC is limited only to ascertain of truth or falsehood of allegations made ... passing of order of summoning any person as accused is a very important matter, which initiates criminal proceeding against him. Such orders cannot be passed
Geeta Singh And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 13 January, 2020
evidence sufficient to warrant conviction. The enquiry u/s 202 CrPC is limited only to ascertain of truth or falsehood of allegations made ... passing of order of summoning any person as accused is a very important matter, which initiates criminal proceeding against him. Such orders cannot be passed
Amar Singh And 3 Others vs State Of U.P. And Another on 8 July, 2020
evidence sufficient to warrant conviction. The enquiry u/s 202 CrPC is limited only to ascertain of truth or falsehood of allegations made ... passing of order of summoning any person as accused is a very important matter, which initiates criminal proceeding against him. Such orders cannot be passed
Brijesh Pandey vs State Of U.P. And Another on 7 July, 2020
evidence sufficient to warrant conviction. The enquiry u/s 202 CrPC is limited only to ascertain of truth or falsehood of allegations made ... passing of order of summoning any person as accused is a very important matter, which initiates criminal proceeding against him. Such orders cannot be passed
Mahendra Kumar Goyal And Another vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 23 January, 2020
evidence sufficient to warrant conviction. The enquiry u/s 202 CrPC is limited only to ascertain of truth or falsehood of allegations made ... passing of order of summoning any person as accused is a very important matter, which initiates criminal proceeding against him. Such orders cannot be passed
Babu Ram And Others vs State Of U.P.And Another on 10 January, 2020
evidence sufficient to warrant conviction. The enquiry u/s 202 CrPC is limited only to ascertain of truth or falsehood of allegations made ... passing of order of summoning any person as accused is a very important matter, which initiates criminal proceeding against him. Such orders cannot be passed
Satya Prakash @ Kallu Gihar And Another vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 8 July, 2020
evidence sufficient to warrant conviction. The enquiry u/s 202 CrPC is limited only to ascertain of truth or falsehood of allegations made ... passing of order of summoning any person as accused is a very important matter, which initiates criminal proceeding against him. Such orders cannot be passed