accused is impotent.
7.The learned trial Judge in respect to the said incriminating
materials, examined the accused under Section ... Court, Sivagangai, came to the
conclusion that the accused is guilty under Section 5(1)(m) r/w 6 of POCSO
Act 2012 and sentenced
issued report under Ex.P.12 stating that there is
nothing to show that the appellant is impotent. Further, PW10 examined the
doctors and recorded ... positive conclusion that both the accused had committed
offence under Sections 376 and 323 of Indian Penal Code and filed final
12 arrested the accused in Coimbatore
and sent him to the remand. On 02.07.2013, he submitted an application
before the Magistrate, wherein he prayed ... impotent. The requisition
given by P.W12 was marked as Ex.P5.
(v) In continuation of investigation, P.W12 submitted an
application
12 arrested the accused in Coimbatore
and sent him to the remand. On 02.07.2013, he submitted an application
before the Magistrate, wherein he prayed ... impotent. The requisition
given by P.W12 was marked as Ex.P5.
(v) In continuation of investigation, P.W12 submitted an
application
sexual intercourse and nothing to
suggest that he is impotent.
(ix)Thereafter, P.W.13 Dhanapal, Inspector of Police examined the
doctors, who treated ... statements and after his completion of investigation, he filed charge sheet
under Section 376 I.P.C against the accused on 20.02.2009.
3.In order
sent to FSL and FSL
result is Ex. PX and PY.
12. PW12 (8) Dr. Vinay Kumar Singh deposed that on 16.2.2008 at
about ... intercourse or impotent. He proved his
report in this regard on the reverse of MLC Ex. PW6/A is Ex.PW12/A which
Nirmala Devi vs Unknown on 26 November, 2013
Author: N.K.Balakrishnan
Bench: N.K
Shri. Mahesha S/O.Shri. Mallikarjuna vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 March, 2014
Nandlal Zagadu Yadav vs The State Of Maharashtra on 21 July, 2022
Author: Shrikant D
Muthukani vs State By Inspector Of Police on 23 February, 2016
Crl.A.(MD) No
