Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

C.Rajamani vs Rathna Bai on 21 October, 2009 Author: R.Mala Bench: R.Mala

would be about 28 years of age and he is not an impotent. (ix) On 12.07.2005, P.W.19 examined P.W.1/Thenmozhi ... requisition/Ex.P.12 to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudachalam, namely, P.W.14/Tmt.Suba Anbumani to record Section

would be about 28 years of age and he is not an impotent. (ix) On 12.07.2005, P.W.19 examined P.W.1/Thenmozhi ... requisition/Ex.P.12 to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudachalam, namely, P.W.14/Tmt.Suba Anbumani to record Section

this will not come under the provision of Section 107 IPC. It is appropriate to incorporate paragraph No.9, which reads as follows ... Supp. (3) SCC 438, the appellant was charged for an offence under Section 306 I.P.C. on the ground that the appellant during

would be about 28 years of age and he is not an impotent. (ix) On 12.07.2005, P.W.19 examined P.W.1/Thenmozhi ... requisition/Ex.P.12 to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Virudachalam, namely, P.W.14/Tmt.Suba Anbumani to record Section

sexual intercourse and nothing to suggest that he is impotent. (ix)Thereafter, P.W.13 Dhanapal, Inspector of Police examined the doctors, who treated ... statements and after his completion of investigation, he filed charge sheet under Section 376 I.P.C against the accused on 20.02.2009. 3.In order

G.Balamurugan vs The State Represented By on 11 December, 2014 Author: R.Mala Bench

Prabhu @ Kulandaivelu vs State Rep. By on 23 February, 2015 Author: R.Mala Bench: R

Azhagunathan vs State Rep. By on 13 March, 2015 Author: R.Mala Bench: R. Mala

P.Danapal vs State Rep. By on 23 March, 2015 Author: R.Mala Bench: R