FINAL OPINION
The result for grouping test is inconclusive. There is no evidence
to suggest he is impotent.’
3.7. Dr.Kalyani (P.W.5), Senior ... opined that
there is nothing to suggest that the accused is impotent.
[h] P.W.5-Dr.Kalyani, Senior Assistant Surgeon,
attached to the Government
FINAL OPINION
The result for grouping test is inconclusive. There is no evidence
to suggest he is impotent.’
3.7. Dr.Kalyani (P.W.5), Senior ... opined that
there is nothing to suggest that the accused is impotent.
[h] P.W.5-Dr.Kalyani, Senior Assistant Surgeon,
attached to the Government
Police for the purpose of
directing the petitioner to undergo potency test. Suppressing the
said order of the learned Magistrate, according to the counsel,
notice ... defence that he is impotent.
5. In the said circumstances, the question of undergoing the
potency test does not arise, when the petitioner himself
purpose, the conducting of medical test for virginity of
the wife is absolutely unnecessary.
10. The conducting of virginity test will not have any bearing ... nowhere stated that her husband is impotent. Thus, filing of
application for conducting virginity test of respondent-wife by the petitioner is
otherwise uncalled
also produced before the
doctor for conducting potency test. The doctor who conducted potency test on
the appellant was examined ... deposed that the appellant
was not impotent. Though the prosecution examined P.W.6 friend of the
appellant in order to prove the case
send the test report.
Thereafter the petitioner contacted the concerned Doctor then she
could know that her husband is impotent and the same is incurable
test on 16.10.2015 at
Kovai Medical College Hospital. Dr.Pandeeswaran (P.W.5)
opined that there was nothing to suggest that the appellant was
impotent ... victim girl, her child and the appellant were
subjected to DNA test at Coimbatore Medical College Hospital
and the same was sent to Forensic Sciece
Hemalatha underwent various tests, the outcome of which showed that the deceased was capable of bearing child, but A1 suffered impotency
petitioner
is impotent and the Advocate for petitioner sought time for filing a
petition to send the petitioner for potency test, but the said
Code of Criminal Procedure , relating to the maintenance to the wife, that impotency of husband amounts to 'cruelty'. Therefore, the contention so raised ... since 'impotency' of husband amounts to cruelty, Therefore, it is necessary, that the husband should stand medical test. In Birendra Kumar Biswas
