Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

purpose, necessary stamp duty has to be paid and the document can also be impounded. This Court considered the above aspect in detail

discloses that A2, the present petitioner, had not signed any of the documents, nor is there any material to show that he was involved ... stated to be gone to Korea, the petitioner’s passport has been impounded, thereby preventing him from travelling to his native country. The defacto complainant

S.Fahath vs Union Of India on 8 December, 2025 Author: N.Sathish Kumar Bench

M/S.Indus Developers vs The Inspector General Of Registration on 28 April, 2025 Author