when the story fails to
inspire confidence of the court as being improbable. In Tameezuddin
v. State (NCT of Delhi ... Supreme Court
found it improbable that the husband of the victim of rape, after
coming to know of the incident, would have gracefully told
when the story fails to inspire confidence of
the court as being improbable. In Tameezuddin v. State (NCT of
Delhi ... Supreme Court found it improbable
that the husband of the victim of rape, after coming to know of the
incident, would have gracefully told
police witnesses cannot be relied upon as
it is doubtful and improbable, besides being biased.
8. Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that bare ... weapon of offence.
Ms.Dubey submits that it is highly unusual and improbable for an
injured person to visit a Homeopathic clinic for treatment
were armed with a rifle, danda and katta, would be
highly improbable. In this background, the case of the prosecution is
challenged on two grounds ... learned counsels
for the appellants that the conduct of PW5 is highly improbable as
after having seen his brother murdered, he would have either taken
Rahul @ Bhuri vs State, Nct Of Delhi on 12 September, 2017
Author: G.S.Sistani
Raj Kumar @ Lala vs State Nct Of Delhi on 12 September, 2017
Author: G.S
contended that the case of the prosecution
would be unbelievable and improbable as according to the prosecution
the appellant Abdul Karim was arrested while ... Learned counsel
further submits that the story of the prosecution is highly improbable
and unbelievable as it is not possible for three persons to have
police.
48. We find that there are numerous inconsistencies, contradictions and
improbabilities in the versions of the prosecution witnesses. Even if
we ignore the minor ... also notice that the narration of PW-22 is also improbable.
According to him, the appellant/accused was summoned to the police
station
master Rohit
has not been examined and it appears to be improbable that a
father would rape to a girl in the presence ... concur with the finding of the Trial Court that it is improbable that
the respondent would have committed rape upon victim in the
presence
could not have identified
the appellants and it is highly improbable that on the date when the
appellants were produced in Court
