Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 105 (0.81 seconds)

Rashmi Sood vs Mahatta & Co. And Ors. on 30 May, 2016

next day of purchase. There was no document to show that the camera in question was malfunctioning or the malfunctioning was brought to the notice ... camera was not functioning as per its specifications. In other words, it was not the case of the complainant that the camera was not functioning
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next