Rajeev Yadav vs Govt. Of Nctd on 25 April, 2023
right to privacy implies that there should be in
camera trials of all cases involving juveniles. The
present system provides this protection
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 373 (1.07 seconds)Sunil Kumar S/O Shri Singhraj vs Government Of Nct Of Delhi on 21 August, 2013
accused and the victim stood to her stand during the camera trial also. Learned counsel stated that finally the applicant was acquitted of the charges
Calcutta Medical Imaging Institute ... vs Department Of Income Tax on 21 October, 2016
loss. As there were delay in not hand over of Camera for
patient trials.". This remark was not given cognizance. Again, in the same ... Revenue loss. As there were delay in hand over of
Camera for patient trials.'
The Ld. A/R has also explained that
Shri Krishan Chand Dahiya vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Others Through on 12 May, 2011
recorded the CD or handled the camera is not relevant because this is not a criminal trial. In disciplinary proceedings we have only
P Praveen Kumar vs South Western Railway on 25 October, 2024
camera in the ladies
toilet which was purchased by him through online on 15.01.2020.
He had used it in his house as trial and further ... applicant before the fact finding committee that he has
taken trial of the spy camera purchased by him through online
T.P. Agarwal (Huf), Meerut vs Department Of Income Tax
made on account of purchase of Retinal Camera.
10. Ld. DR relied on the order of the Assessing Officer and submitted that ... submitted that Topcon
Retinal Camera was agreed to be purchased on trial basis and same was
purchased from Shri Ravi Mehra
Navjot Lehal vs Ut Of Chandigarh on 1 August, 2025
Bharat under his
signature held that "one camera was working in OFFICE ROOM and one
camera was working at the main gate ... supplied Certified copy of Seizure Memo, whereby CCTV footage of
working camera inside OFFICE ROOM of society was seized by IO, as
claimed by JMIC
Navjot Lehal vs Ut Of Chandigarh on 1 August, 2025
Bharat claimed under his signature that "...one camera was
working in OFFICE ROOM and one camera was working at the main gate ... under his signature as above.
(l) Seizure Memo, whereby CCTV cameras footage of working camera
inside OFFICE ROOM of society was seized by IO, since
S.N. Thapa And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 31 August, 2001
have been submitted by the prosecution in the TADA Court where the trial is in progress, may be taken on record ... relied on the prosecution submission that those cases must be heard in camera but the Designated Judge of TADA Court passed the order dated
Atul Singh Chauhan vs Ministry Of Environment, Forest And ... on 18 March, 2021
released by the Hon'ble Court obtaining an
affidavit and trial continues in due course. This is a practice not only
in Prayagraj ... mining with the following recommendations to remedy
the situation:
Installation of CCTV Cameras should be at mining points to
verify the amount of sand extracted