consequently direct the respondents to grant 1 set of 3rd incentive increment
to the petitioner for acquiring M.Ed., by calculating the arrears from ... further advance increment i.e., third set of advance
increment and therefore, since the petitioner has already got two set of
advance increment, she would
Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant 1 set of 3rd
incentive increment to the petitioner for acquiring M.Ed., by calculating the
arrears from ... further advance increment i.e., third set of advance
increment and therefore, since the petitioner has already got two set of
advance increment, she would
Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant one
set of third incentive increment to the petitioner for acquiring M.Ed by
calculating the arrears from ... further advance increment i.e., third set of advance
increment and therefore, since the petitioner has already got two set of
advance increment, she would
Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant one
set of third incentive increment to the petitioner for acquiring M.Phil by
calculating the arrears from ... Mandamus directing the respondents to grant one set of third incentive
increment to the petitioner for acquiring M.Phil qualification by calculating
the arrears from
Incentive increments for Ph.D as per G.O.111)
01.07.1997
Rs.13,680/- + Rs.420/- = Rs.14,100/-
22.10.1997
(Spl. Grade + 5 years
C.Shanthi vs The District Elementary Education ... on 8 May, 2017
Author: R.Suresh Kumar
