direct the second respondent to sanction one set of incentive increment to
the petitioner for acquiring B.Ed., degree with effect from 27.12.2011. Thereafter ... proposal to the second respondent requesting and
sanctioning one set of incentive increment for obtaining higher qualification, i.e.,
B.Ed., degree. The DEO returned
eligible for incentive increment for higher qualification from the last date of
examination of the higher qualification.
3. It is seen that the incentive increment ... caused prejudice to some persons who could
not get the 2nd incentive increment for the higher qualification. In the total service,
any person would
concerned and issue a consequential direction to the respondents
to grant incentive increment for M.Phil. degree from the date following the last
date ... dated 08.12.2010 sanctioned and
disbursed the amount towards 2nd incentive increment for his M.Phil. degree and
thereafter, he received the arrears from the date
concerned and issue a consequential direction to the respondents
to grant incentive increment for M.Phil. degree from the date following the last
date ... dated 08.12.2010 sanctioned and
disbursed the amount towards 2nd incentive increment for his M.Phil. degree and
thereafter, he received the arrears from the date
with certain conditions and one such condition is that the
incentive increment for higher qualification is not applicable to the candidates
appointed in respect ... year 1998. The petitioner is
receiving salary without any incentive increment for her higher qualification.
At the time of appointment, the condition was imposed
Tamil Nadu states that the employee is
eligible to receive incentive increments on the last date of the examination of the
higher studies ... wherein it imposes cutoff date to
receive incentive increments. Further, the Government did not prescribe any cutoff
date to the Secondary Grade Teachers
with certain conditions and one such condition is that the
incentive increment for higher qualification is not applicable to the candidates
appointed in respect ... year 1998. The petitioner is
receiving salary without any incentive increment for her higher qualification.
At the time of appointment, the condition was imposed
petitioner is that the respondents have rejected by
stating that the incentive increment for passing B.Ed., Degree is against law. The
petitioner ... teachers are entitled to two incentive increments only for acquiring higher
qualifications. Two increments or four increments can be granted totally during
the entire period
granted Selection Grade pay. In the year 2013, he was granted incentive
increment for M.A., B.Ed. decree. Subsequently, on 02.06.2008, he was promoted ... increments and it clarifies that the disparity shall be rectified. However, it is not
clarifying whether it refers to annual increments or the incentive increments
granted Selection Grade pay. In the year 2013, he was granted incentive
increment for M.A., B.Ed. decree. Subsequently, on 02.06.2008, he was promoted ... increments and it clarifies that the disparity shall be rectified. However, it is not
clarifying whether it refers to annual increments or the incentive increments
