Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 90 (1.32 seconds)

K. Narayana vs State Of Karnataka on 23 August, 1991

principles of Natural Justice; that once a benefit like the incentive or additional increment is extended, it confers a right on the employees ... incentive is merely an incentive and cannot be equated to a legal right. Accordingly, the learned Single Judge rejected the request to continue the incentive
Karnataka High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

The Director vs M. Manickam on 17 August, 2012

Government service on whatsoever consideration, his service life ends and the incentive increment also comes to an end. On receipt of the said letter, first ... government service on whatsoever consideration, his service life ends and the incentive increment also comes to an end, has submitted that the applicant
Karnataka High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Union Of India vs Mr R Ravichandran on 7 March, 2013

gave a representation requesting to extend the incentive increment in terms of the order dated 4-12-1979 for his wife undergoing tubectomy operation ... incentive is given. If one of the spouses undergo sterilization operation, then, the Central Government employee is given the benefit of a special increment
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next