states that –
“Instructions regarding shortfall documents:-
(i) The bidders not submitting all the desired
documents as per NIT/Tender Document at the
time of submitting ... desired documents as per NIT/Tender document at the time of
submitting bids, should not be allowed to submit documents subsequently and
their bids should
probative
value of such dying declaration, which was described as an
incomplete document.
Held, that the thumb impression taken on the dying
declaration after ... probative value of the dying
declaration which is described as an incomplete document
completed dishonestly by getting the thumb impression of
Elumalai when
application was rejected on the ground that it was accompanied by
incomplete documents i.e. non-submission of documentary evidence of past
performance and experience
empty
formality for imposing penalty, for non production of production of
incomplete documents, but is intended to give an effective
opportunity of hearing to show ... taxes by transporters who were found
carrying goods with fake bilties, incomplete documents and under
suspicious names. Similar provisions had been upheld by this Court
M/S Agmatel India Private Limited vs M/S Resoursys Telecom on 31 January, 2022
Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Gopal Chandra Misra And Ors. on 15 February
High Court, the only justification tendered was that all the
relevant documents relied upon by the detaining authority
were supplied to respondent ... readable and
even then the respondent No.1 furnished incomplete
documents while furnishing the documents of ground of
detention to the petitioner (left behind most
regarding the deposit of title deeds to the form of a
document the document requires registration. If on the
other hand its proper construction ... reasons already mentioned must be held to be an
incomplete document. Therefore it can not be considered as
a contract between the parties. According
award must be
taken to be an incomplete document which could not be
registered. The High Court has found that in the
circumstances of this
copy of the
report stating that it was a highly confidential document.
6. The petitioner has, therefore, approached this Court
under Article ... petitioner was initiated on
July 14, 1978 but due to incomplete documents, a final
decision could be taken only in July 1985. The petitioner
