conduct this case. The
resolution produced at Ex.P1 is incomplete document and is not in
accordance with law therefore no reliance could ... document produced by the complainant at Ex.P1 is incomplete
document. No provision of law permits to produce portion of
document which is relevant
been issued by signing,
either blank or having written thereon an incomplete
document he thereby gives authority to the holder to
make it complete, under ... been issued either wholly blank or having
written thereon an incomplete documents, he authorize
to complete the negotiable instrument and present
before the Bank
Complainant, but they relate to the earlier transaction
between the parties. The document at Ex.D4 which is
said ... Complainant and therefore the document at Ex.D4 is an
incomplete document which does not disclose real state
of affairs. Hence on these ground
strictly relay on Ex.P10 document
which is admittedly incomplete document produced
before this court. The defence set up by the accused is
that ... 25037/2017
20
explained. No doubt Ex.P10 is an incomplete
document even in the absence of Ex.P10 document
materials available
establish the
said defence. Ex.D1 and 2 are incomplete documents which are
not sufficient to rebut the presumptions. The accused has not
produced
stamp paper relied upon by the co
is a incomplete document as it is a Blank Stamp paper
and same is not sufficient to prove
respectively.
It is pertinent to mention here that incomplete documents have
been filed by the complainant and therefore, they cannot be relied upon.
Further
regarding the absence of the said documents. The
Complainant has filed incomplete documents to support his case though they
have been mentioned in the affidavit
agreement dated 21.10.2012 on the very face of it is an incomplete
document. There is reference to certain cheques, the details whereof
have not been
First party signature
2. Second party signature
First of all this document is incomplete and further, this document
does not imply that complainant has made
