Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 4937 (1.62 seconds)

R.Muthulakshmi vs Valliammal on 16 July, 2021

combination plea of irreconcilables, which law understands as inconsistent pleadings. Both pleas of family arrangement and ouster pre- supposes that the heirs of Nachammal ... does not prohibit inconsistent pleadings, still during trial, the party pleading them ought to elect one among the various inconsistent pleadings. This was not done
Madras High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - N Seshasayee - Full Document

R.Muthulakshmi vs Valliammal on 16 July, 2021

combination plea of irreconcilables, which law understands as inconsistent pleadings. Both pleas of family arrangement and ouster pre- supposes that the heirs of Nachammal ... does not prohibit inconsistent pleadings, still during trial, the party pleading them ought to elect one among the various inconsistent pleadings. This was not done
Madras High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - N Seshasayee - Full Document

R.Muthulakshmi vs Valliammal on 16 July, 2021

combination plea of irreconcilables, which law understands as inconsistent pleadings. Both pleas of family arrangement and ouster pre- supposes that the heirs of Nachammal ... does not prohibit inconsistent pleadings, still during trial, the party pleading them ought to elect one among the various inconsistent pleadings. This was not done
Madras High Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - N Seshasayee - Full Document

N. Srinivasan vs Muthammal on 29 January, 1998

whether it was permissible to allow the parties to plead inconsistent pleas. In the said judgment a reference was made to an earlier decision ... that even the admission made in the original pleadings can be explained and even inconsistent pleas can be taken in the pleadings. The Supreme Court
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 15 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next