Section 155 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
corrupt inducement to give his evidence ; (3) by proof of former statements inconsistent with any part of his evidence which is liable to be contradicted
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 100822 (7.39 seconds)Ajodhya Prasad Bhargava vs Bhawani Shanker Bhargava And Anr. on 8 May, 1956
that When a party enters the witness-box and makes a statement inconsistent with the previous statement, his duty of explaining the previous admission ceases ... that a party has entered the witness-box and made a statement inconsistent with the previous statements without explaining as to how and under what
Dilo Begum vs State Of H.P on 27 March, 2024
general rule, permitted to
contradict him with his previous inconsistent
statements, nor allowed to impeach his credit by general
evidence of bad character. This rule ... means of leading questions or by
contradicting him with his previous inconsistent
statements or by asking questions with regard to his
discreditable past conduct
Dilo Begum vs State Of H.P on 27 March, 2024
general rule, permitted to
contradict him with his previous inconsistent
statements, nor allowed to impeach his credit by general
evidence of bad character. This rule ... means of leading questions or by
contradicting him with his previous inconsistent
statements or by asking questions with regard to his
discreditable past conduct
Reserved On: 24.10.2024 vs State Of H.P on 6 November, 2024
police and they are shown to have made two inconsistent
statements on two different occasions.
14. It was submitted that the testimonies of the witnesses ... general rule, permitted to contradict
him with his previous inconsistent statements, nor
allowed to impeach his credit by general evidence of bad
character. This rule
Sat Pal vs Delhi Administration on 29 September, 1975
tendency of his answers, or from a perusal of his
previous inconsistent statement or otherwise, thinks that
the grant of such permission is expedient ... leave of
13
the court, confronts his witness with his previous
inconsistent statement he A also does so in the hope that
the witness might
Sat Paul vs Delhi Administration on 30 September, 1975
general rule, permitted to contradict him with his previous inconsistent statements, nor allowed to impeach his credit by general evidence of bad character. This rule ... means of leading questions or by contradicting him with his previous inconsistent statements or by asking questions with regard to his discreditable past conduct
Damber Singh Chettri vs The State Of Sikkim on 9 July, 2018
police
statements are never considered to be fatal. The statements
given by the witnesses before the police are meant to be brief
statements and could ... statement though seemingly inconsistent with
the evidence need not necessarily be sufficient to amount to
contradiction. Only such of the inconsistent statement which is
liable
Queen-Empress vs Mannu on 13 July, 1897
made no difference to the accused's right whether the statements were recorded separately from the diary, or were included in it.
35. From ... witness to be impeached is "by proof of former statements inconsistent with any part of his evidence which is liable to be contradicted
Ghanshyambhai Madhavlal Patel vs State Of Gujarat & on 11 December, 2014
Ghanshyambhai Madhavlal Patel vs State Of Gujarat & on 11 December, 2014
Author: J.B