Inder Pal Yadav And Ors. Etc vs Union Of India And Ors Etc on 18 April, 1985
Equivalent citations ... Author: D.A. Desai
Bench: D.A. Desai , Misra Rangnath
PETITIONER:
INDER PAL YADAV AND ORS. ETC.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
UNION OF INDIA
whichever is later.
------------------------------------------------------------
By the judgment dated April 18, 1995 in Inder Pal Yadav
& Ors. Etc. v. Union of India ... view of the scheme which was
approved by this Court in Inder Pal Yadav temporary status
could be granted to Project Casual labour only from
Railways framed a Scheme for casual labour and sought approval in Inder Pal Yadav v. Union of India (1985.2 SCC 648). Desai J. speaking ... facie, contrary to Apex Court's decision in Inder Pal Yadav case, therefore, illegal and non-est. In Dakshin Railway Employees Trivandrum Division
Apex Court delivered in the case of Inder Pal Yadav Vs. Union of India & Ors. 1985 (2) SCC 648. In order to substantiate ... Apex Court passed in the case of Inder Pal Yadav (Supra). In the case of Inder Pal Yadav (Supra) Honble Apex Court has approved
terms of para 5.1 of SC judgment in the case of
Inder Pal Yadav.
2- O.A. No. 060/1351/2019
(ii) To issue directions ... judgment of the Hon‟ble Supreme Court in the case
of Inder Pal Yadav Vs. Union of India and Others
which read as follows:-
Para 11: ".... The decision in Inder Pal Yadav does not support such a view. It must, therefore, be held that ... scheme which was accepted by this Court in the case of Inder Pal Yadav Project Casual Labour could not claim temporary status and such temporary
which read as follows:
Para 11: ...The decision in Inder Pal Yadav does not support such a view. It must, therefore, be held that prior ... scheme which was accepted by this Court in the case of Inder Pal Yadav Project Casual Labour could not claim temporary status and such temporary
Apex Court in the matter of Inder Pal Yadav v/s Union of India in
21
OA No. 746/2016
the Hon'ble Apex ... Apex Court's
decisions in Inder Pal Yadav case ; that the existence of only four
categories of railway employees, namely (1) permanent, (2) temporary
Radhakrishna Panicker .
6. By the Judgment dated April 18,1985 in Inder Pal Yadav v. Union of India , this Court approved the said scheme ... prior to the acceptance of the scheme by this Court in Inder Pal Yadav Project Casual Labour were entitled to grant of temporary status
same principle in both the
cases.
16. In the case of Inder Pal Yadav (2005) 11 SCC 301, the Apex Court
held that since promotion ... relevant part of the order of the Apex Court in Inder Pal Yadav case reads
thus:
"6. However, while the petitioners cannot be granted
