arbp-275.12 (j).doc
awarded to the petitioner was not an indivisible contract and application
AG-2 or other applications forming part of the said ... indivisible contract. I shall first decide whether the
finding rendered by the arbitral tribunal that the contract awarded to the
petitioner was indivisible is contrary
contract was a divisible contract in the
sense that there were two independent contracts involving supply
of goods and materials and another contract involving supply ... would not be possible to disintegrate the contract into a contract for
sale of goods and a contract for work and labour. A submission
contract awarded by the
petitioner to the respondent was an indivisible contract and the interest
on delayed advance payment was a part of payment terms ... interpreted the terms of the
contract and has rendered finding of fact that the contract was an
indivisible contract and thus, the limitation could
contract and two independent contracts, though
embodied in a single instrument.
50. It is submitted that if there are two separate contracts, the
contract ... separately from the
contract of service, so that even if the contract for service fails, the
contract for sale survives independently.
51. It is submitted
contract was a divisible contract in the
sense that there were two independent contracts involving supply
of goods and materials and another contract involving supply ... would not be possible to disintegrate the contract into a contract for
sale of goods and a contract for work and labour. A submission
contract was a divisible contract in the
sense that there were two independent contracts involving supply
of goods and materials and another contract involving supply ... would not be possible to disintegrate the contract into a contract for
sale of goods and a contract for work and labour. A submission
contract was a divisible contract in the
sense that there were two independent contracts involving supply
of goods and materials and another contract involving supply ... would not be possible to disintegrate the contract into a contract for
sale of goods and a contract for work and labour. A submission
contract was a divisible contract in the
sense that there were two independent contracts involving supply
of goods and materials and another contract involving supply ... would not be possible to disintegrate the contract into a contract for
sale of goods and a contract for work and labour. A submission
contract was a divisible contract in the
sense that there were two independent contracts involving supply
of goods and materials and another contract involving supply ... would not be possible to disintegrate the contract into a contract for
sale of goods and a contract for work and labour. A submission
contract was a divisible contract in the
sense that there were two independent contracts involving supply
of goods and materials and another contract involving supply ... would not be possible to disintegrate the contract into a contract for
sale of goods and a contract for work and labour. A submission
