furtherance of connivance and conspiracy,
Respondent No. 2, the maker of speech along with the
Respondent No. 3 the videographer published the video on
social ... Magistrate has failed to appreciate that the
highly slanderous, derogatory and inflammatory speech had
been delivered by Respondent No. 2, which was
videographed by Respondent
denied the
suggestion that none of the accused persons made any inflammatory
speech/instigating speech. Vol. Accused Kuldeep Dagar made such a speech
Dhar, Jagat
Singh and Mohan Singh thereafter one by one made inflammatory
speeches exhorting the workmen to resort to violence and beat up
the officers
Vijender Gupta was the
leader of the demonstrators and he gave a speech saying that "is march ki
FIR No. 35/2011 ... Delhi Police ko pata chalni chiya " except this allegedly
inflammatory speech by the accused Vijender Gupta, this witness has
nothing more to say about
Dhar, Jagat Singh and
Mohan Singh, thereafter, one by one made inflammatory speeches
exhorting the workmen to resort to violence and beat up the officers
companions were raising great noise using a
loud speaker for making inflammatory speeches and saying among
other things that they will ruin the factory
infact on 06.01.2007, a
Dharna coupled with slogan shouting and inflammatory
speeches was held outside the school premises, which
matter was duly reported
Mohan Singh, thereafter, one by one made inflammatory
ID No. 38/2006/2002
11
speeches exhorting the workmen to resort to violence and beat
temple by writing
inflammatory and defamatory remarks against the plaintiff society. The
defendants published and circulated pamphlets and delivered speeches to
this effect also ... defendants when he tried to
stop the defendants from delivering one such speech in the temple premises.
Since then, the defendants are threatening to overthrow
Cbi vs Sajjan Kumar on 20 September, 2023
IN THE COURT OF MS. GEETANJLI GOEL
