28th November 1995 respondent no.1 had already
obtained and ex parte injunction restraining the encashment
of bank guaranteee, no payment was made ... appellant by
the bank.
Respondent no.1 then filed another injunction
application dated 12th January, 1996 with regard to the
second bank guarantee dated 24th
these
appeals. The question is whether a person who disobeys an
interim injunction made by the Civil Court can be punished
under Rule ... City Civil Court, Bombay (Suit No.1407 of 1991) for a
perpetual injunction restraining the first defendant from
carrying on any construction in the suit
said respondent had also filed an application for the grant
of an injunction restraining the appellant, his agents, employees and
servants from in any manner ... February, 1997, the Hon'ble Single Judge passed the order of
injunction in favour of the respondent No. 1 and against the appellant
decision was concerned only with
the period during which an order of injunction restraining
the Board from collecting the revised charges was in
operation ... this Court opined that an order of injunction
does not prevent the accrual of interest provided by the
relevant tariffs/rules. Sharma, J. pointed
Judge of this Court (Original Side) confirming the ex parte order of injunction and rejecting the defendants, application for vacation of the ex parte order ... injunction dated 23-5-1996 in a trade mark case.
2. The plaintiff Himalaya Drug Co. is engaged in the manufacture and sale of Ayurvedic
plaintiffs in approaching the court for grant of interim reliefs of injunction and acquiescence on the part of the plaintiffs in allowing the defendants ... plaintiffs obtained ad-interim injunction restraining issuance of the shares. The ad interim order was extended to 10-4-1995 defendants made a statement that
obtained an order of interim injunction restraining the petitioner from conducting the auction. The auction was stopped and as the notification was no more ... obtained an order of interim injunction in the City Civil Court. As the notification was no more in force
himself to be a tenant under the defendant filed this suit for injunction to restrain her from entering into the building. It is the case ... suit was filed on 1.8.1997, and on the same date, an interim injunction was granted as follows:
Heard. Perused the records. There is prima facie
respondent for declaration of title to the suit property and injunction directing the appellant to remove water tank, shed etc. constructed over the same ... house and shop let out to him. The respondent also claimed injunction directing the appellant to remove the illegal constructions made by him over
sake of convenience) for the grant of mandatory injunction directing the appellants (hereinafter referred to as the appellants in order to facilitate the reference ... Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure for ad interim mandatory injunction where through he prayed that the appellants, their servants and agents
