Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for
permanent injunction without impleading respondent Nos.2 to 7. That
during the pendency of the suit ... favour of various banks for
raising finances for the project, an injunction was sought against the
petitioner restraining him from alienating the property in favour
respondent in suits filed in the court of District Munsif, Visakhapatnam seeking injunction not to terminate the contract and other incidental reliefs. The respondent also ... prayed for temporary injunction against the petitioner restraining it from encashing the bank guarantees. The learned Dist. Munsif granted ex parte interim injunction. While
possession of a portion of a channel and for a permanent injunction restraining the petitioner from interfering with the respondent's possession and enjoyment ... contesting the suit. The respondent has file and application for a temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit.
The trial Court ordered the said application
issue of a perpetual and a mandatory injunction in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kurnool, against the respondents herein in a representative capacity, under ... Subordinate Judge, it would appear that as a consequence of injunction orders passed in I. A. No. 675/55 Respondents
instituted O.S.No.148 of 2011 against the
petitioners, seeking perpetual injunction, restraining the petitioners from
interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment ... under the provisions of Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 for temporary injunction.
The Court below granted temporary injunction on 8.08.2013 and the
petitioners herein
Court, Hyderabad. The suit was filed for the grant of a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's possession ... Hyderabad. Pending suit the petitioner prayed for the issue of a temporary injunction restraining the defendants respondents from interfering with the petitioner's possession
suit of the 2nd defendant for permanent injunction has been dismissed and in OS No. 11/89, suit of the 3rd defendant for specific performance ... meantime, the 3rd defendant had filed a suit for permanent injunction against the 1st plaintiff and her husband K. Ramankutty alias Lingam bearing
file of the IX
Junior Civil Judge, for permanent injunction against K.Sheshagiri Rao
and others is still pending and therefore, the suit filed seeking ... file of the IX Junior Civil Judge,
for permanent injunction against K.Sheshagiri Rao and others?
5. If not, whether the defendants got any sort
Property Act to defend his possession; and (3) whether a suit for injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff-vendee's possession ... unlawful means. he accordingly filed the suit for a permanent injunction against defendants 1 to 5 to restrain them from interfering with his possession
also filed I.A. 1492/80 against Periaswamy for ad interim injunction restraining him from interfering with her possession. Interim injunction was granted ... obtained the sale-deed without payment of consideration. The interim injunction restraining Periaswamy from disturbing her possession of B portion is ultimately confirmed by this
