loan were covered by
the insurance policy of National Insurance Company Limited;
the National Insurance Policy only covered loss arising due to
perils named therein ... insurance
through defendant No. 1 and that the plaintiff was compelled to
accept the insurance policy.
IV. It was asserted that the insurance coverage
loan were covered by
the insurance policy of National Insurance Company Limited;
the National Insurance Policy only covered loss arising due to
perils named therein ... insurance
through defendant No. 1 and that the plaintiff was compelled to
accept the insurance policy.
IV. It was asserted that the insurance coverage
three issues against the Insurance
company.
Arguments of the Insurance Company
4. The learned counsel for the Insurance Company has submitted
that they are only ... that for the
purposes of registration of vehicle, insurance policy is a requirement,
and therefore, insurance coverage is granted prior to registration of the
vehicle
three issues against the Insurance
company.
Arguments of the Insurance Company
4. The learned counsel for the Insurance Company has submitted
that they are only ... that for the
purposes of registration of vehicle, insurance policy is a requirement,
and therefore, insurance coverage is granted prior to registration of the
vehicle
from an insurance company or an agent recognized by the
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority established
under the provisions of the Insurance Regulatory and
Development ... months from an
insurance company or an agent recognized by the Insurance
Regulatory and established under the provisions of the Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority
from an insurance company or an agent recognized by the
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority established
under the provisions of the Insurance Regulatory and
Development ... months from an
insurance company or an agent recognized by the Insurance
Regulatory and established under the provisions of the Insurance
Regulatory and Development Authority
employees. It is
contended that the petitioner-Insurance
Insurance Company had issued the insurance
policy extending insurance coverage to the owner
owner-driver and that ... expiry of 60 days, the insurance company had issued
insurance policy. The insurance policy nowhere provided personal
accident coverage to the driver As such
There is insurance policy insured with the Opp. Party No. 1. The
insurance policy number is 4008/220359545/00/000 and the coverage
period ... date of accident is 27.9.2021,
the accident occurred during the insurance coverage period.
Page 2 of 15
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
Signed by: BHABAGRAHI
owner and the
hirer, and in the insurance policy filed by the petitioner, the insurance
coverage is shown from 23.07.2013 onwards which is the date ... proportionate insurance amount for the relevant period at the time of
accident on 05.01.2011 owing to non-existence of insurance coverage. In
that view
insurance company submits that Ex.R1/insurance policy is valid
for the period from 14.8.2009 to 13.8.2010. Therefore, there
was no insurance coverage. Hence ... Before the Tribunal, the insurance company has
produced insurance policy - Ex.R1. As per Ex.R1, the insurance
policy is valid
