question, was
got comprehensively insured, by the complainant, being the owner
thereof, for the insured declared value of Rs.8 lacs on payment of premium ... vehicle, in question, was got comprehensively
insured by the complainant, with the
opposite party for the insured declared
value of Rs.8 lacs
question, was
got comprehensively insured, by the complainant, being the owner
thereof, for the insured declared value of Rs.8 lacs on payment of premium ... vehicle, in question, was got comprehensively insured by the complainant, with the opposite
party for the insured declared value of
Rs.8 lacs
complainant as a case of Total Loss and should pay the Insured Declared Value
of the car to the complainant, as per insurance cover ... Party No.5 and got it insured from
Opposite Parties No.3 & 4 for the Insured Declared Value of Rs.7.15 lacs. Unfortunately
Model 2008 got it
insured, with the Opposite Party, for the Insured Declared Value of
Rs.1,90,000/-, for the period from ... owner of the car, in question, got the same insured for
the Insured Declared Value of Rs1,90,000/- for the period from
total loss/constructive total loss of the vehicle-the Insureds
Declared Value (IDV) of the vehicle (including accessories there on) as
specified in the schedule ... insured value which comes to Rs.4,51,350/-.
In other words, 75% of the insured value of vehicle is less than the repair
value
same insured
with the opposite party for a sum of Rs.4,10,000/- against own damage on insured
declared value basis. The policy ... insured is not mentioned, yet, the surveyor in his report, aforesaid, has
specifically written that the vehicle was insured on insured declared value
basis
that, the vehicle in question, was insured
with Opposite Parties No.1 &2, for the Insured Declared Value ... factum, that the vehicle in question, was insured, in her name, for the Insured Declared Value
of Rs.4,03,940/-, for the period from
same comprehensively insured for the insured
declared value of Rs.2,74,940/- , for the period from 28.8.2009 to 27.8.2010. On 21.11.2009, a colleague ... doubt, the car, in question, was insured by the complainant with the opposite parties,
for the insured declared value
insured the same, with the Opposite Party for the period
from 17.5.2010 to 16.5.2011, for the Insured Declared Value (hereinafter to be
referred ... complaint, having been filed by the complainant, for payment of full insured
declared value of the vehicle, the District Forum, allowed the same. Feeling
aggrieved
referred to as opposite party No.1. Sum assured was the insureds declared value
of the vehicle. Policy was effective
from ... vehicle that since the estimated
cost of repair exceeded the insureds declared value, for which the vehicle was
insured, repair be not carried
