appeal in O.A.No.25 of 2004 before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, hereinafter referred to as the Board. Contending that no registration ought ... detailed order dated 6-8-2004, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board dismissed O.A.No.26 of 2004 filed by the Kangayam party against
dated 14th March, 2019 along with
the stay application before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board
(IPAB) on 17th May, 2019. However, the stay application ... Deputy Registrar by IPAB is reproduced
hereunder:-
"I. Establishment of Intellectual Property Appellate Board
1. Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by Section
assets including all its patents, registered designs,
trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property rights including the
subject Trade Mark(s) to the respondent. The respondent ... June 16, 1987, Volvo assigned all its trademarks, copyrights and other
intellectual property rights without any limitation to the respondent.
Necessary entry was made
intellectual property right means any right to intangible property, namely, trademarks, designs, patents or any other similar intangible property, under any law for the time ... Property Right as defined under Section 65(55a) means any right to intangible property, namely, trade marks, designs, patents or any other similar intangible property
employment of defendant No. 2 with the plaintiff, all
intellectual property rights in everything and anything created, made,
developed or written during defendant ... being CS(COMM) No. 370/2017 alleging infringement of its alleged
intellectual property by defendants No. 2 and 3 and one Ms.Prema Sridevi.
Defendants
Ammini Karnan vs Intellectual Property Appellate Board on 27 March, 2013
Equivalent citations: AIR 2013 (NOC) 431 (MAD.)
Author: Aruna Jagadeesan
Bench: Elipe Dharma ... Mills
Okkal Post, Kalady, Ernakulam,
Kerala-683 550 .. Petitioner
Vs
1. Intellectual Property Appellate Board,
2nd Floor, Annexure-I, Guna Complex,
443, Anna Salai, Teynampet
that the impugned
order restricts it from exercising, inter alia, its intellectual property right in
the tagline created by using rhyming words - as an expression ... retardant wires & cable products. The plaintiff claims that it enjoys
intellectual property rights in the said tagline. The plaintiff claims
copyright/ trademark
1431/2019
THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR PROTECTION
OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (INDIA GROUP) …APPLICANT(S)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA ….RESPONDENT(S)
JUDGEMENT
S. RAVINDRA BHAT ... which directions are sought
that till a new chairperson of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (hereafter
referred to as “the board” or “IPAB”), is appointed
Intellectual Property Attorneys ... vs Union Of India & Anr on 9 October, 2014
Author: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
Bench: Chief Justice , Rajiv Sahai Endlaw ... 3679/2014 & CM No.7455/2014 (for stay)
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. C.M. Lall, Adv., Ms. Prathiba M.
Singh
Lean Research & Development A/S vs Intellectual Property Appellate Board on 30 June, 2011
Bench: M.Y.Eqbal , T.S.Sivagnanam
IN THE HIGH ... Lean Research & Development A/S .. Petitioner
vs.
1.Intellectual Property Appellate Board
Guna Complex, Annex 1
2nd floor, 443, Anna Salai,
Teynampet, Chennai
