public, but the company selling the phone number did not.
55. In Interactive Prods.Corp. vs. A2Z Mobile Office Solutions ... internet context, where internet users seeking a trademark owner's website are diverted (i) either by identical
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Private ... vs The Advertising Standards Council Of ... on 17 May, 2024
Author
offering
their services to customers within this jurisdiction. Their applications and
website are interactive platforms that can be accessed by any individual in
Chennai, allowing ... business within this jurisdiction. Moreover, the
defendants' mobile applications and websites are interactive platforms that
can be accessed by users in Chennai, further supporting
referred to to say that even the presence of interactive website will create cause of action.
32 Laxmikant V. Patel Vs. Chetanbhai Shah and another
kerala. The applicant's
products are widely available in interactive websites whereby the
products are readily available and delivered in the city of Chennai
defendant. It also unfurls from the pleadings that the defendant's website www.drjohnslab.net contains detailed explanation about each and every product ... India including Chennai. It is also averred that it is an interactive website. It further emerges from the pleadings that the alleged offending products
products are available at Chennai and that the defendant operates the
interactive website, which is accessible at Chennai.
__________
Page1
also stated that the respondents sell products on line through interactive
websites accessible in Chennai.
3. Considering the aforesaid, it appears that a part
website by the customers all over the world.
The plaintiff has also registered in travel websites like tripadvisor, zomato,
expedia.com and other interactive forums ... plaintiff and the domain name of
the defendants in the website launched by them is almost identical to that of
the domain name
filed the typed set of
papers, wherein, the Global Interactive Malls Private Limited
“Website:http://www.magazinemall.in, in which the petitioner alleged to
have ... order on 08.04.2019 for purchase of 8
International journals shown as incorrect website. The said Company is
6/10
http://www.judis
