party (i) has, after the solemnisation of the marriage, had voluntary sexual intercourse with any person other than his or her spouse
section (2) of section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, where sexual intercourse by the accused is proved and the question is whether ... shall presume that she did not consent. Explanation. - In this section, "sexual intercourse" shall mean any of the acts mentioned in clauses
verbal or non-verbal communication, communicates willingness to participate in the specific sexual act: Provided that a woman who does not physically resist ... consenting to the sexual activity. Exception 1.— A medical procedure or intervention shall not constitute rape. Exception 2.— Sexual intercourse or sexual acts
employed or used for the purpose of prostitution or illicit intercourse with any person or for any unlawful and immoral purpose, or knowing ... Explanation II.— For the purposes of this section “illicit intercourse” means sexual intercourse between persons not united by marriage or by any union
lawfully married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that belief, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description
such party is the husband, that he has had sexual intercourse with any woman outside wedlock, it may at the instance of the other party
upon any premises with intent that she may have sexual intercourse with any man other than her lawful husband, shall be punishable on first conviction ... brothel or in or upon any premises for the purpose of sexual inter-course with a man other than her lawful husband, if such person
Singh committed rape on her. Each one of the accused
committed sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix forcibly
and against her will. They all subjected ... been promiscuous in
her sexual behavior earlier, she has a right to refuse to
submit herself to sexual intercourse to anyone and everyone
because
Indian Penal Code, 1860
497. Adultery.—
Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe ... another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence
Court
have concurrently held that though the prosecutrix had consented
to sexual intercourse with the appellant, the consent was obtained
by fraud and deception inasmuch ... having sexual relationship. This is what appears to have happened
in this case as well, and the prosecutrix willingly consented to
having sexual intercourse with