Supreme Court
proceeded, on the aspect of the scope of interference with the arbitral
awards by the Court, to rule thus:
"19. Therefore ... well-
settled that courts ought not to interfere with the arbitral award in a
casual and cavalier manner. The mere possibility of an alternative
view
face
of the award, as Courts do not sit in appeal against
the arbitral award. The permissible grounds for
interference with a domestic award under ... decisions, an award can be set aside only if the
award is against the public policy of India. The award can
be set aside under
awards, after dissecting and reassessing factual
aspects of the cases to come to a conclusion that the
.
award needs intervention and thereafter, dubbing the
award ... face of the award, as courts do not
sit in appeal against the arbitral award. The
permissible grounds for interference with a domestic
award under
authority under Section 31 to award the post-
.
award interest and there is nothing bad in the award. Hence, he
prayed that the present objections ... face of the award, as Courts do not
sit in appeal against the arbitral award. The
permissible grounds for interference with a domestic
award under
aside award do not
include power to modify such an award. Given the limited scope of
judicial interference with award under Section 34 on extremely ... Uncitral Model Law and the
legislative policy of minimal judicial interference in arbitral
awards.
xxx xxx xxx
Signature Not Verified
O.M.P. (COMM
aside award do not
include power to modify such an award. Given the limited scope of
judicial interference with award under Section 34 on extremely ... Uncitral Model Law and the
legislative policy of minimal judicial interference in arbitral
awards.
xxx xxx xxx
Signature Not Verified
O.M.P. (COMM
face of the award, as courts do not
sit in appeal against the arbitral award. The permissible
grounds for interference with a domestic award under ... undefined
conclude on the face of the award that the award shocks the
conscience of the Court, interference is permissible.
29. In the case
exists in the Award passed by Learned Arbitrator.
NO PATENT ILLEGALITY IN AWARD:
REAPPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE IMPERMISSIBLE
AND BEYOND SCOPE OF INTERFERENCE IN
SECTION ... view is possible is not
a ground for interference in Section 37 proceedings.
Interference with the Award in Section 34 / 37 proceedings
is virtually prohibited
exists in the Award passed by Learned Arbitrator.
NO PATENT ILLEGALITY IN AWARD:
REAPPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE IMPERMISSIBLE
AND BEYOND SCOPE OF INTERFERENCE IN
SECTION ... view is possible is not
a ground for interference in Section 37 proceedings.
Interference with the Award in Section 34 / 37 proceedings
is virtually prohibited
exists in the Award passed by Learned Arbitrator.
NO PATENT ILLEGALITY IN AWARD:
REAPPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE IMPERMISSIBLE
AND BEYOND SCOPE OF INTERFERENCE IN
SECTION ... view is possible is not
a ground for interference in Section 37 proceedings.
Interference with the Award in Section 34 / 37 proceedings
is virtually prohibited
