page 401:-
"32. Post award interference and the extent of the
second look by the courts under Section ... stop adjudication
as an alternative to court adjudication, and
therefore, post award interference by the courts is
un-warranted, and an anathema that undermines
justice.
42.4. When an award is unreasonable or perverse.
42.5. When an award is patently illegal, which would
include an award in patent contravention ... face of the award, as Courts do not sit
in appeal against the arbitral award. The permissible
grounds for interference with a domestic award under
Court finds that the award is vitiated by patent illegality appearing
on the face of the award:
Provided that an award shall ... justice.
42.4. When an award is unreasonable or perverse.
42.5. When an award is patently illegal, which would
include an award in patent contravention
Court finds
that the award is vitiated by patent illegality
appearing on the face of the award:
Provided that an award shall ... award is implied
unless such award portrays perversity unpardonable under
Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
(16) The grounds on which an interference
Court finds that the award is vitiated by patent
illegality appearing on the face of the award:
Provided that an award shall ... Development Authority , (2015) 3 SCC 49 has held that the
interference with an arbitral award is permissible only when the
findings of the arbitrator
submitted that it is well settled that the scope of
interference with an award under Section 34 of the A&C
Act was narrow ... ground. Even under the 1940 Act where the
scope of interference with the award was
much more, the Apex Court in Tarapore
mandatorily
requires an arbitral Award to state reasons on
which it is based. The impugned Award merely
sets out the contentions of the parties ... passed a well reasoned award,
based on the pleadings, evidence and admissions. All
grounds of challenge to the award are denied and the
excerpts
mandatorily
requires an arbitral Award to state reasons on
which it is based. The impugned Award merely
sets out the contentions of the parties ... passed a well reasoned award,
based on the pleadings, evidence and admissions. All
grounds of challenge to the award are denied and the
excerpts
mandatorily
requires an arbitral Award to state reasons on
which it is based. The impugned Award merely
sets out the contentions of the parties ... passed a well reasoned award,
based on the pleadings, evidence and admissions. All
grounds of challenge to the award are denied and the
excerpts
mandatorily
requires an arbitral Award to state reasons on
which it is based. The impugned Award merely
sets out the contentions of the parties ... passed a well reasoned award,
based on the pleadings, evidence and admissions. All
grounds of challenge to the award are denied and the
excerpts
