Additional Chief Judge,
City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereby, the subject interlocutory
application filed by the revision petitioner/defendant under
Section ... evidence. At that juncture, the
revision petitioner/defendant filed the subject interlocutory
application seeking permission of the Court below to receive the
Photostat copy
contend that after commencement of arguments in the suit, the
subject Interlocutory Application was filed. The proposed
amendment challenging the Rule XI of defendant ... permitted to amend the plaint as sought for in
the subject Interlocutory Application?"
6) POINT: As seen from the record, the petitioner/plaintiff filed
order, dated
05.02.2010. The Court below, while dealing with the subject
Interlocutory Application, had gone into the merits of the subject
suit with regard ... aside the order under challenge
and allow the subject interlocutory application by condoning the
delay of 547 days in filing the petition to set aside
Civil Judge, Jangaon, wherein the Court below
has dismissed the subject Interlocutory Application filed by the
revision petitioners/plaintiffs, under Section 151 of the Code ... Court below is
justified in dismissing of the subject Interlocutory Application
and ultimately, prayed to dismiss the Civil Revision Petition.
5. In view
necessary. The Court below ought to have allowed the subject
interlocutory application and ultimately prayed to set aside ... 3519/2018
order under challenge and allow the subject interlocutory
application as prayed for.
4. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the
respondents
Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad,
wherein the subject Interlocutory Application filed by the
petitioner/plaintiff under Order VI Rule ... copy of the document in question and immediately filed the subject
Interlocutory Application seeking amendment of the plaint to add
the relief of declaration
aside the order under challenge and allow the subject
interlocutory application as prayed for.
4. The Court below, while dealing with the subject matter ... subject interlocutory application, held that P.W.1 and P.W.2 were
examined. The original plaintiff, who filed the suit, is no more
respondent
No.1/plaintiff. The Court below erroneously dismissed the subject
Interlocutory Application and ultimately prayed to set aside the
impugned order and allow ... respondent No.1/plaintiff would contend
that the subject Interlocutory Application was filed belatedly. There
are no details of alienation. Further, the documents filed
Court below without
considering the above aspects, erroneously dismissed the
subject Interlocutory Application and ultimately prayed to set
aside the impugned order dated ... Hyderabad
Trust. The Court below is justified in dismissing the subject
Interlocutory Application. There is no material illegality to
interfere with the impugned order
Civil
Court, at Hyderabad, wherein the Court below dismissed the
subject Interlocutory Application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff,
under Section 45 of Indian Evidence ... necessary and ultimately prayed to allow the
subject Interlocutory Application as prayed for.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent
contended that
