India challenging the order dt.07.11.2019
passed in Interlocutory Application ... parties.
3. In the said AOP, the petitioner had filed Interlocutory
Application No.735 of 2019 under Section 36 of the said Act to stay
India challenging the order dt.07.11.2019
passed in Interlocutory Application ... parties.
3. In the said AOP, the petitioner had filed Interlocutory
Application No.735 of 2019 under Section 36 of the said Act to stay
RAMACHANDRA RAO
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2020 in Interlocutory Application No.3 of 2019
and
Interlocutory Application ... Interlocutory Application No.2 of 2019
and
Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2019 in Interlocutory Application No.3 of 2019
in/and
Writ Petition
RAMACHANDRA RAO
AND
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2020
in
Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2019
in
Writ Petition ... Writ Petition No.23057 of
2019.
Interlocutory Appliation No.1 of 2020 in Interlocutory Application No.1 of
2019 in Writ Petition No.23057
interlocutory application, namely being I.A.No.857 of 1985 and
sought appointment of Receiver. The said interim application was
allowed. Thereafter, another interlocutory application ... Prime Properties filed
an interlocutory application, namely
interlocutory application, namely being I.A.No.857 of 1985 and
sought appointment of Receiver. The said interim application was
allowed. Thereafter, another interlocutory application ... Prime Properties filed
an interlocutory application, namely
interlocutory application, namely being I.A.No.857 of 1985 and
sought appointment of Receiver. The said interim application was
allowed. Thereafter, another interlocutory application ... Prime Properties filed
an interlocutory application, namely
interlocutory application, namely being I.A.No.857 of 1985 and
sought appointment of Receiver. The said interim application was
allowed. Thereafter, another interlocutory application ... Prime Properties filed
an interlocutory application, namely
interlocutory application, namely being I.A.No.857 of 1985 and
sought appointment of Receiver. The said interim application was
allowed. Thereafter, another interlocutory application ... Prime Properties filed
an interlocutory application, namely
interlocutory application, namely being I.A.No.857 of 1985 and
sought appointment of Receiver. The said interim application was
allowed. Thereafter, another interlocutory application ... Prime Properties filed
an interlocutory application, namely
