first time.
7. The principles relating to grant of interlocutory injunction in matters of this type and the exercise of the power of the appellate ... case will the court grant an interlocutory injunction as of course. (Potter v. Chapman. (1750) Amb 98 at 993.
The tendency is to avoid trying
regulated but in no case does the court grant an interlocutory injunction as of course. Courts in England follow the rules of avoiding trying ... same question on two occasions one for the purpose of interlocutory injunction and the other for the purpose of final determination unless they find that
affidavit filed in support of the interlocutory injunction, the appellant has reiterated the contentions raised in the plaint.
8. The respondent herein filed common counter ... well as the interlocutory applications.
9. The learned Judge on consideration of the matter rejected the prayer for interlocutory injunction and aggrieved by the said
settled
principles of law regulating grant or refusal of interlocutory injunction,
this Court can interfere with the said order. But if such power was exercised ... ignores the settled principles of
law regulating grant or refusal of interlocutory injunction. An appeal
against exercise of discretion is said to be an appeal
adequately compensated.
20. Similarly, while considering the grant of an interlocutory injunction during pendency of legal proceedings is a matter requiring the exercise of discretion ... plaintiff would suffer an irreparable injury if his prayer for interlocutory injunction is disallowed.
Relief by way of interlocutory injunction is granted to mitigate
product for the other.
72. The grant of an interlocutory injunction during the pendency of legal proceedings is a matter requiring the exercise of discretion ... order of temporary injunction or to Interfere with an order of interlocutory injunction is purely equitable.
73. While exercising the discretion, the Court applies
revision petitioner for the purpose of granting an order of interlocutory injunction during the pendency of the suit was dismissed.
The facts :-
2. The petitioner ... praying for an order of interlocutory injunction during the pendency of the suit. In the said application, the petitioner has detailed the reasons which made
applicants. Therefore, the abovesaid suit along with the abovesaid three interlocutory applicants are filed by the applicants/plaintiffs before this Court.
5. The case ... interim injunction based on the given facts and circumstances. Keeping the above situation in mind, let me consider the issue involved in these interlocutory applications
appellant filed O.A.Nos.708 to 710 of 2007 for interlocutory injunction.
4. The appellant preferred O.A.No.708 of 2007 for injunction ... injunction and as such failed to exercise the discretion in accordance with the principles regulating the grant of injunction by way of interlocutory injunction, pending
loss.
xx xx xx xx xx
43. The grant of an interlocutory injunction during the pendency of legal proceedings is a matter requiring the exercise ... plaintiff would suffer an irreparable injury if his prayer for interlocutory injunction is disallowed. The decision whether or not to grant an interlocutory injunction
