from whom the information was derived by the defendants. The Master allowed the interrogatory, and on appeal, the Judge affirmed the order, but the Court ... malice and leave was sought to administer to the dependents' interrogatories. Interrogatory No. 5 was what steps and/or precautions did you take
discussion so far made, would show that the
interrogatory raised by the petitioner would have to be said to be
irrelevant in terms of second ... interpreted within the
narrow technical limits and the power to allow interrogatory must be
exercised liberally. There can be no quarrel about the proposition
Romer L.J. observed that though the court has jurisdiction to allow an interrogatory asking from whom such information was obtained, undoubtedly an interrogatory ... settled practice in the case of newspapers not to allow interrogatories as to the source of information at an interlocutory stage. It pointed out that
good as interrogatories. Interrogatories must not be exhibited unreasonably or veraciously, nor be prolix, oppressive, unnecessary or scandalous. Nor should interrogatories be allowed which ... side and sold on the other, and for that reason the interrogatory was allowed.
20. In this case, however, the interrogatories relate
Statement. In fact, the defendant, as a rule, is not allowed to deliver interrogatories to the plaintiff before he has filed Written Statement ... also a settled legal position that as a general rule, interrogatories are to be allowed, whenever the answer to them will serve either to maintain
court has said that as a general rule the interrogatories are to be allowed. Even there the court had held that answer to such interrogatories ... relevant during the cross examination are not necessarily relevant as interrogatories. Normally interrogatories are those relating to "any matters in question" and they
Thus, if at all the party has delivered
the interrogatories, that is to be allowed.
9. In first proviso to rule 1 of Order ... interrogatories. For the purpose of delivering
interrogatories, particular procedure is laid down in rule 1, viz. the
interrogatories should be in writing and no interrogatories
impugned order, the trial Court has permitted the
plaintiffs to deliver interrogatories, by allowing the application (Exh.37) filed
by the plaintiffs under order ... trial Court has committed an error by permitting the plaintiffs to
deliver interrogatories after the trial commenced and affidavit in lieu of the
examination
administrative tribunal and the administrative tribunal ought to have allowed the request for serving the interrogatories upon the respondents, at that stage of the case
Canbank Mutual Fund vs Bank Of Karad Ltd on 20 December, 2019
Author: A.K
