15th January, 1999, HVPN filed replies to the additional objections submitted by intervenors in the course of the hearing on 12th January ... would be continued on 28th January, 1999. By 21st January, 1999, two intervenors had filed rejoinders to HVPN's replies to their original objections; both
provide for the Commission unfettered authority over the matters raised by the intervenors in this objection. For example, the performance standards that the licensee must
Condition 7, which deals with prohibition of subsidies among separate businesses. The intervenor argues that without that change, it appears that the bulk supplier ... Section 12(3) of the Act. The reason put forward by the intervenor for the suggested change is that in order to maintain commercial viability
under Haryana Electricity Regulatory Reforms Act
137.
The Commission understands that the intervenor is concerned about past interference with the procurement processes of the HSEB
reason for many of the most basic concerns raised by both the intervenors and HVPN. Our reasons for adopting or not adopting the many proposed
decision in the matter. The Commission shall determine the extent to which intervenors shall be entitled to receive copies of pleadings. (3) Unless permitted
involving purchase of power above average procurement price, is finalised. The intervenor suggests that due mechanism to resolve the above mentioned objections should be incorporated
replies to these additional objections at the hearing of 15th January, 1999. Intervenors were directed that they might file rejoinders to these replies, and that
Regular Licence under Haryana Electricity Regulatory Reforms Act
119. Commission view.
- The intervenor correctly states the goal of the statute. Ultimately, the only subsidies
Electricity Regulatory Reforms Act
188. Commission view.
- Some of the information that intervenors would require HVPN to provide already is at least implicitly required
