derogation to the eligibility criteria and without actually the
candidates being interviewed in a reasonable process and to present
its report to the Chief Secretary ... authority earlier
though they came to learn on the respective dates of interview itself
(8th April, 2013/12th April, 2013) that they have not been
screening committee found the
petitioner fit to be called for an interview. The petitioner was
called for an interview by a letter dated 16th August ... duly appeared before the interview board on 14th December,
2007. By a letter dated 3rd January, 2008 the petitioner's prayer
was not acceded
said advertisement the
petitioner applied and he was called for an interview scheduled on 27th March, 2015 by a letter
dated 19th March, 2015 issued ... Only two days prior to the said scheduled
date of interview, a letter dated 25th March, 2015 was again issued by the respondent
candidates who secured less
marks in academics and scored high marks in interview/aptitude test could
not have been a ground for setting aside ... discrepancies were pointed out to the effect that all the
interviewers were called over the phone to take interview and that there was
no guideline
candidates who secured less
marks in academics and scored high marks in interview/aptitude test could
not have been a ground for setting aside ... discrepancies were pointed out to the effect that all the
interviewers were called over the phone to take interview and that there was
no guideline
candidates who secured less
marks in academics and scored high marks in interview/aptitude test could
not have been a ground for setting aside ... discrepancies were pointed out to the effect that all the
interviewers were called over the phone to take interview and that there was
no guideline
candidates who secured less
marks in academics and scored high marks in interview/aptitude test could
not have been a ground for setting aside ... discrepancies were pointed out to the effect that all the
interviewers were called over the phone to take interview and that there was
no guideline
candidates who secured less
marks in academics and scored high marks in interview/aptitude test could
not have been a ground for setting aside ... discrepancies were pointed out to the effect that all the
interviewers were called over the phone to take interview and that there was
no guideline
candidates who secured less
marks in academics and scored high marks in interview/aptitude test could
not have been a ground for setting aside ... discrepancies were pointed out to the effect that all the
interviewers were called over the phone to take interview and that there was
no guideline
candidates who secured less
marks in academics and scored high marks in interview/aptitude test could
not have been a ground for setting aside ... discrepancies were pointed out to the effect that all the
interviewers were called over the phone to take interview and that there was
no guideline
