process of short listing of
candidates, the petitioners were called for interview for the post of Assistant
Lineman as they were fulfilling all the required ... qualifications.
However, when they approached respondent No.2 for
interview, the petitioners were denied the interview stating the reason that
the Diploma of IIT obtained
being fully eligible for the
said post applied well in time. The interview was to be conducted for the
said post ... date fixed i.e. 3.8.2009, the petitioner was
duly interviewed.
It is the specific averment of the petitioner that the DEO,
Panipat was present during
typing test and after the typing test, a
final list for interview was prepared by the respondents in which name of the
petitioner ... qualified the written test, were mentioned in the
said final list for interview after the typing test. Thus, according to the
petitioner the respondents have
said
advertisement. The respondent-Commission decided to short-list the
candidates for interview on the basis of their academic qualification vide
notice dated 12.4.2012 attached ... Commission has mentioned that it may short-list the
candidates for interview by holding a written examination and thus, the
action of the Commission
further averments, on 30th January, 2012 the
petitioner received interview letter issued by the respondents to him for the
said post. The date of interview ... fixed for 15th February, 2012. The
petitioner received another interview letter for the said post for 17th
February, 2012. It has been specifically alleged
secured 92 marks
out of 150. Thereafter, he was called for the interview vide interview letter
dated 3rd May, 2011. According to the petitioner ... meritorious
candidate and had done very well in the interview, but to his surprise he
was not selected for the said post in the General
list of successful candidates for the
purpose of calling them for interview for the post of LDC. Accordingly, the
Civil Writ Petition No.13990 ... petitioner was called for interview and data punching test on computer vide
letter dated 20.04.2010, in which he faired very well and was hopeful
General Category. He was allotted roll No.00307 and
was called for interview vide letter dated 29.1.2010. The peti-
tioner, accordingly, appeared in the interview ... selection criterion
and marks allocated for academic qualification, expe-
rience and interview during the selection process is
not disclosed to the candidate then their legitimate
said
advertisement. The respondent-Commission decided to shortlist the candidates
for interview on the basis of their academic qualification vide notice dated
12.4.2012 attached ... Commission
has mentioned that it may short-list the candidates for interview by holding a
written examination and thus, the action of the Commission
applications, the petitioners were found to be eligible and were called
for interview. However, respondent No.2 declined to interview the
petitioners on the ground ... with the
applications and the same was produced at the time of interview which had
been issued after the last date of submission of applications
