them 32,563 candidates were found eligible
and called for interview. The Railway Board by its letter
dated 17.5.1996 communicated its decision to prepare ... made
on viva voce test only. The candidates were interviewed
from July 1996 to February 1997 by different committees.
The composition of the committees
said to have passed the Driving
Test, were again called for personal interview by a Letter dated 3.7.1996, which
was held on 26.7.1996. Thereafter ... High Court was that the Selection Committee, which
conducted the personal interview, exercised the power of allotment of 25%
marks, arbitrarily and in such
called by
the petitioner to prove the contents of an interview
telecast in April, 1996 by Asianet wherein the respondent
No. 1 is alleged ... cassette `Vicharana'. Abdul
Razak (PW 20) claimed to have viewed the interview.
We would first proceed to assess the testimony of the
three main
State
Government). During the period from 19.12.96 to 28.12.96 typing tests and
interviews were said to have been conducted by the said Selection
Committee ... Exchange and sufficient time
was also found not given in calling for interviews resulting in number of
deserving candidates being denied an opportunity to participate
question involved is as to how any candidates
should be called for interview/viva voce by the union of
public service commission (for short ... admitted case that the number if candidates who are called
for interview/viva voce test are not ore than twice the
number of vacancies which
applicants had acquired the requisite educational
eligibility qualification on the date of interview. The
fact remains that the applications filed by all such
applicants were ... that the
candidates who have acquired requisite qualification at the
time of interview and have been selected by the Selection
Committee be issued
held on 11.7.1998. Results of the
same were published on 29.7.1998 and interviews were conducted on
27.8.1998. The Tribunal noticed that inasmuch as the Government ... examinations were held on 19.7.1998 and results have
been published on 29.7.1998. Interviews were however held on 29.7.98
in such cases. The events have taken
Science, the respondent No. 5 being senior most.
Both were called for interviews on 13th September 1995.
Sometime before the date of the interview ... Department
to the Vice Chancellor requesting for the holding of an
urgent interview for the appointment of Professor; Marine
Science. The note placed on record
University
Institution."
The appellant and the respondent No. 1 both applied.
Interviews were held on 1st March 1987. By this date, the
respondent ... Work, had in
addition acquired her Ph.D. degree. The Selection Committee
interviewed all the candidates including the appellant and the
respondent
necessary testimonials of the candidates and prepare a list
of candidates for interview by the Selection Committee.
The Selection Committee shall then finalise the
list ... successful candidates in order of merit after
interview and shall put up the list before the Board for
approval. While approving the list, the Board
