candidates, i.e., appellant and
respondent No.1, were called for interview on 1st December,
2008. It was the case of respondent No.1 that ... along with the
other certificates and testimonials at the time of interview.
The Commission, respondent No. 3, published the list of
selected candidates on 15th
parties before the Court and held her eligible to appear in the
interview as per Rule 24 of the Orissa Superior Judicial Service and
Orissa ... from 15-18.07.2009.
The list of successful candidates, who were eligible for interview, was
published on 25.8.2009 in which respondent's name
made on the basis of a written
test followed by oral interviews and minimum qualifying marks would be
fixed for the tests. The relevant passage ... starting from top to bottom, the applicants will be called for
Oral Interviews. However, minimum qualifying marks will be
prescribed and the aforesaid will also
rules.
This may be treated as most urgent."
13. An interview of the petitioner given to the correspondent
of the newspaper 'Daily Ajit ... Chairman-
respondent No. 3 sought her explanation terming the said interview
as having lowered the reputation of the Board (P-6), which was
followed
Government of National Capital Territory of
Delhi and who were interviewed on 10th & 11th September ... length of experience was an
eligibility condition for being invited for the interview, the experience
certificate furnished by the candidates could not be treated
examination declared on 24/10/2010 by allowing them to appear in interview by not considering/ignoring condition prescribed in Note (2) of Condition ... Officer were held by the RPSC on 5/10/2010 and thereafter interviews commenced from 12/1/2011 and would continue upto 14/2/2011
seniority list as per merit on the
basis of performance in the interview.
It was therefore not possible for
the UPSC to prepare a combined ... UPSC before the Tribunal contended, inter
alia, that the interview for different
disciplines viz specialists I medicine, surgery
and gynecology in Ordnance Factories Organization
were
Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi but he was not called for
interview scheduled to be held on 23.8.2010. Being dissatisfied with the said
action ... tribunal seeking a
direction to the petitioner to call the respondent for interview. The tribunal
by its order dated 13.8.2010, while issuing notice, passed
reference to their merit in written examination and quality point marks, for interviews and by declaring the final results within two months.
Brief facts giving ... After the results of the written examination were declared, and before the interviews could take place, Dr. Ramesh Chandra Pandey and others preferred Writ Petition
Government of National Capital Territory of
Delhi and who were interviewed on 10th & 11th September ... length of experience was an
eligibility condition for being invited for the interview, the experience
certificate furnished by the candidates could not be treated
