Notice issued to accused Nos.1 and 2 were returned unclaimed inspite
of giving intimation. Exts.P5 to P7 are the postal receipts ... were returned unclaimed inspite of
Crl.R.P.No.2287/2009
4
giving intimation which indicated that they were aware of the claim being made
1745/09 & 1746/09 2
dishonour intimation and demand being made to the
petitioner, he did not pay the amount and hence the
complaints ... issued to the petitioner in his proper address was
returned `unclaimed' though, intimation was given to him. In
Crl.R.P.No.1745
show that statutory notice issued to the petitioner was returned
unclaimed though intimation was given to the petitioner. Power of
Attorney of respondent
dated 26.6.2003 respondent No.1 issued notice to the petitioner
intimating dishonour and demanding payment of the amount. Exts.P4 and P5
are produced ... reached the address. Ext.P6 shows that notice was returned
unclaimed though, intimation was given to the petitioner. Endorsement
statutory notice to the petitioner but the notice was returned unclaimed inspite of
intimation given to the petitioner as seen from Exts ... notice sent on behalf of respondent No.1 was returned unclaimed
inspite of intimation given to the petitioner indicates that petitioner was aware
notice was issued
to the petitioner but it was returned unclaimed inspite of giving
intimation. Issue and return of notice as aforesaid are proved ... notice issued on behalf of respondent
No.2 was returned unclaimed inspite of intimation indicated that he
was aware the claim being made on behalf
intimating dishonour and demanding payment of the
amount. Notice was returned unclaimed though intimation was served on the
petitioner. Hence the complaint alleging offence punishable
intimating dishonour and demanding repayment of the respective amounts
and the notices are returned as unclaimed. Proprietor of the complainant gave ... circumstances pleaded by them. That, notices intimating dishonour of cheques
and demanding payment of amount were returned unclaimed indicates that
accused were aware
registered post intimating dishonour and
demanding payment of the amount. According to respondent No.1, inspite of
giving intimation to the petitioner about registered notice ... that intimation was served on petitioner on 23.2.1998, 24.2.1998
and on 5.3.1998 and since it was not claimed, it was returned 'unclaimed'.
Section
notice to the petitioner on 29.3.2006 intimating
dishonour and demanding payment of the amount. Notice was returned
unclaimed. Dishonour of the cheque for reason ... petitioner in correct address by registered post. Ext.P6 shows that intimation
was given to the petitioner but notice was not claimed
