statutory notice was issued. Statutory notice returned with
the endorsement 'intimation given, unclaimed'. Since the
amount remained unpaid, the complaint was laid ... correct. The endorsement shown in the cover was
that 'intimation given, unclaimed.' As per Section 114 of the
Evidence Act, it is presumed
lordship
pleased to held that, "return of postal cover as
intimated unclaimed by itself would not amounts to
constructive notice when
cheque
amount was returned with a postal shara "unclaimed/intimation
delivered to the addressee" on 5.5.2012. But the accused failed ... very postal shara "door
locked" cannot be construed as unclaimed or intimation delivered
as rightly pointed out by the defence counsel. Therefore
Rajendran) that, "return of postal cover
as intimated unclaimed by itself would not amounts to
constructive notice when it is not averred in complaint
returned unserved to the
accused with the shara" intimation delivered" unclaimed but the
accused has not complied the notice and thus accused committed ... RPAD
postal cover is returned with the postal shara " Intimation
delivered unclaimed " etc. As per the case of complainant , inspite
of issuance
sufficient fund in the account and
the notice was returned unclaimed after due intimation.
Though he was cross examined by the counsel for the accused ... complainant and it was returned
with endorsement 'unclaimed' after due intimation. Further it
was admitted by DW1 that he will not be always
with endorsement intimation given and unclaimed. It was
admitted by DW1 that Dr.P.P.Rukiya mentioned in that address
is none other than ... along
with his wife and the notice was returned with endorsement
unclaimed after intimation was given. So, under the
circumstances, courts below were perfectly justified
petitioner and the office report is that the notices have remained unclaimed despite intimation. Respondents are, thus, deemed to have been served
both the cases there is an endorsement "door
locked, intimation delivered, unclaimed, return to the sender". The
accused has not produced any documentary
both the cases there is an endorsement "door
locked, intimation delivered, unclaimed, return to the sender". The
accused has not produced any documentary
